The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review
Abstract
Obtaining absolute chromophore concentrations from photoacoustic images obtained at multiple wavelengths is a nontrivial aspect of photoacoustic imaging but is essential for accurate functional and molecular imaging. This topic, known as quantitative photoacoustic imaging, is reviewed here. The inverse problems involved are described, their nature (nonlinear and ill-posed) is discussed, proposed solution techniques and their limitations are explained, and the remaining unsolved challenges are introduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Photoacoustic tomography of blood oxygenation: A mini review
Li, M., Tang, Y., & Yao, J. (2018) · Photoacoustics · doi:10.1016/j.pacs.2018.05.001 · Cited by 359
Ramamonjisoa, N., & Ackerstaff, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2017.00003 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, B., Laufer, J. G., Arridge, S. R., & Beard, P. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Optics
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 061202
- ISSN
- 1083-3668 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148309086
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.jbo.17.6.061202
- The paper
- Cox, B., Laufer, J. G., Arridge, S. R., & Beard, P. C. (2012). Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review. Journal of Biomedical Optics. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.17.6.061202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
