Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Integrating optical coherence tomography and bioluminescence with predictive modeling for quantitative assessment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus biofilms

Demidov, Valentin V., Jackson, Olivia P., Demidova, Natalia, Gunn, Jason R., Gitajn, Ida L., Elliott, Jonathan T.·2025·Journal of Biomedical Optics

Abstract

SignificanceMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilm infections present a critical challenge in orthopedic trauma surgery and are notoriously resistant to systemic antibiotic therapy. Noninvasive, quantitative imaging methods are urgently needed to assess biofilm burden and therapeutic efficacy, especially for emerging photodynamic therapy (PDT) strategies.AimWe aim to establish a quantitative framework using a combined bioluminescence and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging approach to correlate bioluminescent signal with viable MRSA burden in both planktonic and biofilm states and to determine how biofilm density and structure influence this relationship.ApproachBioluminescent MRSA (SAP231-luxCDABE) was cultured in planktonic and biofilm forms using in vitro growth models in 24-well plates and custom macrofluidic devices, respectively. Bacteria bioluminescence intensity (BLI), counted colony-forming units (CFU), and OCT-based biofilm thickness measurements were collected to construct linear regression models to evaluate how well BLI alone, or combined with biofilm density (CFU/volume), predicts bacterial counts across culture conditions.ResultsBioluminescence strongly correlated with CFU in planktonic cultures (R2=0.98). In biofilms, BLI per CFU decreased with density, indicating metabolic downregulation, and BLI alone was less reliable (R2=0.59). Incorporating biofilm density (CFU/volume) improved prediction (R2=0.84). A joint model for both states showed excellent fit (R2=0.985), but the biofilm versus planktonic group remained a significant factor (p=0.002), revealing systematic differences. This highlights the need for a mixed-model approach that segments subvolumes by morphological features to improve accurate, generalizable CFU estimation across both growth states.ConclusionsBioluminescence alone underestimates bacterial burden in dense, metabolically suppressed MRSA biofilms. The combination of BLI with OCT-derived structural metrics enables accurate, nondestructive quantification of viable bacterial load. This approach provides a robust toolset for preclinical evaluation of antimicrobial therapies, particularly for optimizing PDT dosimetry and assessing biofilm response in translational infection models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/1.jbo.30.s3.s34111

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Demidov, V. V., Jackson, O. P., Demidova, N., Gunn, J. R., Gitajn, I. L., & Elliott, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
  • Dartmouth College
  • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Ctr.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Optics
Published
2025-09-23
Volume
30
Issue
S3
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 1083-3668
  • 1560-2281
Cited by
3
References
0
Funders
  • Department of Orthopaedics at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centre
  • Hitchcock Foundation and Dartmouth Cancer Center
  • National Institutes of Health (R01AR081952)
  • Dartmouth Electron Microscopy Facility DCC I2M-ACM Shared Resource (RRID:SCR_025077)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating optical coherence tomography and bioluminescence with predictive modeling for quantitative assessment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.jbo.30.s3.s34111
The paper
Demidov, V. V., Jackson, O. P., Demidova, N., Gunn, J. R., Gitajn, I. L., & Elliott, J. T. (2025). Integrating optical coherence tomography and bioluminescence with predictive modeling for quantitative assessment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus biofilms. Journal of Biomedical Optics. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.30.s3.s34111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.