Cryptanalysis and improvement of an image encryption scheme using combination of one-dimensional chaotic maps
Abstract
This paper performs cryptanalysis of a recently proposed image encryption scheme. The original encryption scheme uses plain image parameter to modify secret keys as a security measure and is based on improved one-dimensional (1-D) chaotic map with larger chaotic range than existing 1-D chaotic maps. 1-D chaotic maps have simple structure and have lower computation cost than higher dimensional chaotic maps. However, it has been found that the encryption scheme is vulnerable toward chosen plaintext attack with computational complexity of attack less than complexity of brute force attack. In addition, this paper presents an enhanced encryption scheme to remedy the flaws of original scheme. The security of the proposed encryption scheme has been analyzed through experimental results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The enhanced version of Pak et al.'s scheme suggested in [16] remains vulnerable to chosen-plaintext attack.
“The enhanced version of Pak's scheme suggested in [16] is found still vulnerable against chosenplaintext attack [17].”
From When an attacker meets a cipher-image in 2018: A year in review (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
In 2018, improvement methods were proposed to fix reported security defects in a number of papers on image cryptanalysis.
“In 2018, improvement (enhancement, remedy) methods were proposed to fix the reported security defects in a number of papers on image cryptanalysis as references [6,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,30,32,119,131].”
From When an attacker meets a cipher-image in 2018: A year in review (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
A chaos-based symmetric image encryption scheme using a bit-level permutation
Zhu, Z.-L., Zhang, W., Wong, K.-W., & Yu, H. (2011) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2010.11.009 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Security analysis of a chaos-based image encryption algorithm
Lian, S., Sun, J., & Wang, Z. (2005) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2005.01.001 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Color image encryption based on chaotic systems and elliptic curve ElGamal scheme
Wu, J., Liao, X., & Yang, B. (2017) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.04.006 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When an attacker meets a cipher-image in 2018: A year in review
Li, C., Zhang, Y., & Xie, E. Y. (2019) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102361 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
- Authors
- Panwar, K., Purwar, R. K., & Jain, A.
- Affiliations
- Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IN)
- Venue
- Journal of Electronic Imaging
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2018-10-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 1017-9909 (ISSN-L)
- 1560-229X
- OpenAlex
- W2903088404
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 12 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Electronic Imaging (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Keywords
- image encryption, cryptanalysis, one-dimensional chaotic maps, chosen-plaintext attack, secret key generation, chaos-based cryptography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review