Few-shot class-incremental learning based on representation enhancement
Abstract
Few-shot class-incremental learning (FSCIL) is crucial and practical for artificial intelligence in the real world, which learns novel classes incrementally from few samples without forgetting the previously learned classes. However, FSCIL confronts two significant challenges: “catastrophic forgetting” and “overfitting new.” We focus on convolutional neural network (CNN)-based FSCIL and propose a human cognition-inspired FSCIL method, in which the knowledge of novel classes is learned under the guidance of the previously learned knowledge. Specifically, we learn a discriminative and generalized CNN feature extractor from the base classes in the first task. We generate the representations of base and novel classes in unified feature space without training on novel classes, thus avoiding “forgetting old.” For the novel classes in long sequential tasks, beyond the representation generation, we enhance the representation by exploring the correlations with the previously learned classes to alleviate overfitting new and ensure that the novel classes adapt to the feature space. Experimental results show that our proposed method achieves very competitive results on MiniImageNet and CIFAR-100 datasets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yao et al. [90] proposed a simple strategy for enhancing the new prototype.
“Yao et al. [90] proposed a simple strategy for enhancing the new prototype.”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [90]
The fusion enhancement strategy imitated human cognition by guiding new class learning based on existing knowledge.
“This fusion enhancement strategy imitated human cognition by guiding new class learning based on existing knowledge.”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [90]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigence
Chaudhry, A., Dokania, P. K., Ajanthan, T., & Torr, P. H. S. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01252-6_33 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
A review of Convolutional-Neural-Network-based action recognition
Yao, G., Lei, T., & Zhong, J. (2019) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.05.018 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Self-citationEncoder Based Lifelong Learning
Rannen, A., Aljundi, R., Blaschko, M. B., & Tuytelaars, T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.148 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey
Zhang, J., Liu, L., Silvén, O., Pietikäinen, M., & Hu, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3529038 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“[90]proposed asimplestrategyforenhancingthenewprototype.”
- Authors
- Yao, G., Zhu, J., Zhou, W., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- Chengdu University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yao, Guangle
- Venue
- Journal of Electronic Imaging
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2022-08-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1017-9909 (ISSN-L)
- 1560-229X
- OpenAlex
- W4289755902
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Electronic Imaging (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- few-shot class-incremental learning, catastrophic forgetting, sequential tasks, convolutional neural networks, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review