Detection and parameter estimation for space-borne radar linear frequency modulated pulse signal in low signal-to-noise ratio
Abstract
To solve the problem of detecting the space-borne radar linear frequency modulated (LFM) pulse signal contaminated by spurious clutter and interference under a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a detection and parameter estimation algorithm based on the time-frequency image enhancement and Hough transform (HT) is proposed. First, short-time Fourier transform (STFT) is carried out on the space-borne radar LFM pulse signal with the Gaussian window to acquire the time-frequency spectrum; the spectrum is then converted into the time-frequency image. Second, in order to observe the weak signal’s details from the image, contrast stretching is implemented on the time-frequency image and the trailing induced by the spurious clutter is eliminated to strengthen the chirp line of the LFM signal. Third, the line is detected through HT on the enhanced time-frequency image, and the coordinates and gray values of the pixels passed through by the line are extracted in the time-frequency image; then these gray values are filtered by the median filter before being binarized with the gray threshold; the anti-pulse-splitting mechanism is adopted to determine the start and the end of the chirp line segment. Measured data experiments show that the method can effectively detect the space-borne radar LFM pulse signal under a low SNR environment, determine the pulse’s arrival time and end time, estimate its parameters, and is superior to direct STFT-Radon transform and direct STFT-HT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The LFM signal is a typical LPI radar signal.
“The linear frequency modulation (LFM) signal is a typical low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signal.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parameter Estimation of SAR Signal Based on SVD for the Nyquist Folding Receiver
Li, T., Zhu, Q., & Chen, Z. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18061768 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, X., Li, T., Fan, X., & Chen, Z. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19061477 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Detection and parameter estimation of the LFM signal has been a typical issue in the radar field [13].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Wang, J., Zou, J., Su, S., & Chen, Z.
- Affiliations
- National University of Defense Technology (CN)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2015-08-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1931-3195 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110088502
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National University of Defense Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
- Keywords
- spaceborne radar, linear frequency modulated pulses, low signal-to-noise ratio, parameter estimation, Hough transform, short-time Fourier transform, time of arrival estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review