Never-ending struggles with mid-spatial frequencies
Abstract
Optical surfaces feature a wide range of length scales from “figure” down to “finish”, but the mid-spatial frequency structure (MSF) holds growing significance. Cost-effective production of systems demands answers to multiple layers of related questions, such as how best to quantify MSF, assess its optical impact, and employ existing production tools to meet MSF requirements. These answers evolve as new production technologies are introduced. I present general observations about a few of the associated challenges and attempt to clarify some essential aspects related to quantifying MSF as well as estimating its impact.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MSF errors can cause detrimental effects on optical performance including increased small angle scatter, increased downstream modulation/intensification, and reduced image contrast.
“MSF errors can cause detrimental effects on the optical performance including increased small angle scatter, increased downstream modulation/intensification, and reduced image contrast [6-11].”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing
Suratwala, T., Tham, G., Steele, R., Wong, L., Menapace, J., Ray, N., & Bauman, B. (2023) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.482739 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Forbes, G. W.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Corresponding author
- Forbes, G. W.
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2015-06-22
- Volume
- 9525
- Pages
- 95251B
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1446320569
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced optical system design
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Optical Coatings and Gratings
- Keywords
- optical fabrication, surface metrology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review