Cited by 35Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAugmented Reality ApplicationsSinusitis and nasal conditions

Image-based navigation for functional endoscopic sinus surgery using structure from motion

Open access
Leonard, Simon, Reiter, Austin, Sinha, Ayushi, Ishii, Masaru, Taylor, Russell H., Hager, Gregory D.·2016·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) is a challenging procedure for otolaryngologists and is the main surgical approach for treating chronic sinusitis, to remove nasal polyps and open up passageways. To reach the source of the problem and to ultimately remove it, the surgeons must often remove several layers of cartilage and tissues. Often, the cartilage occludes or is within a few millimeters of critical anatomical structures such as nerves, arteries and ducts. To make FESS safer, surgeons use navigation systems that register a patient to his/her CT scan and track the position of the tools inside the patient. Current navigation systems, however, suffer from tracking errors greater than 1 mm, which is large when compared to the scale of the sinus cavities, and errors of this magnitude prevent from accurately overlaying virtual structures on the endoscope images. In this paper, we present a method to facilitate this task by 1) registering endoscopic images to CT data and 2) overlaying areas of interests on endoscope images to improve the safety of the procedure. First, our system uses structure from motion (SfM) to generate a small cloud of 3D points from a short video sequence. Then, it uses iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm to register the points to a 3D mesh that represents a section of a patients sinuses. The scale of the point cloud is approximated by measuring the magnitude of the endoscope's motion during the sequence. We have recorded several video sequences from five patients and, given a reasonable initial registration estimate, our results demonstrate an average registration error of 1.21 mm when the endoscope is viewing erectile tissues and an average registration error of 0.91 mm when the endoscope is viewing non-erectile tissues. Our implementation SfM + ICP can execute in less than 7 seconds and can use as few as 15 frames (0.5 second of video). Future work will involve clinical validation of our results and strengthening the robustness to initial guesses and erectile tissues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2217279

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Image-based navigation techniques do not require specialized equipment but rely on traditional intra-operative imaging.

    “Image-based navigation techniques do not require specialized equipment but rely on traditional intra-operative imaging that enabled the minimally invasive technique in the first place.”

    From The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Leonard et al., 2016

    The Introduction and Method describe navigation based on endoscopic images registered to a CT scan, supporting the imaging portion of the claim. But the Method says the endoscope’s motion is tracked with a 6DOF magnetic tracker to estimate reconstruction scale, and the Results describe attaching that tracker to the endoscope. This contradicts the claim that the technique requires no specialized equipment. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1]Rosenfeld RM Piccirillo JF Chandrasekhar SS Brook I Ashok Kumar K Kramper M Orlandi RR Palmer JN Patel ZM Peters A Walsh SA Corrigan MD Clinical practice guideline (update): adult sinusitis Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 152 S1 S39 4 2015 25832968
  2. [2]Labruzzo SV Aygun N Zinreich SJ Imaging of the Paranasal Sinuses: Mitigation, Identification, and Workup of Functional Endoscopic Surgery Complications Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 48 805 815 10 2015 26117299
  3. [3]Strauss G Limpert E Strauss M Hofer M Dittrich E Nowatschin S Lth T Evaluation of a daily used navigation system for FESS Laryngo- rhino- otologie 88 776781 12 2009 19816838
  4. [4]Lorenz K Frhwald S Maier H The use of the BrainLAB Kolibri navigation system in endoscopic paranasal sinus surgery under local anaesthesia. An analysis of 35 cases HNO 54 11 851 860 2006 16528504
  5. [5]Kennedy DW Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Technique Archives of Otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill: 1960) 111 643 649 10 1985 4038136
  6. [6]Krings J Kallogjeri D Wineland A Nepple K Piccirillo J Getz A Complications of primary and revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis Laryngoscope 124 4 838 845 2014 cited By 1 24122737 PMC4357345
  7. [7]Otake Y Leonard S Reiter A Rajan P Siewerdsen JH Gallia GL Ishii M Taylor RH Hager GD Rendering-Based Video-CT Registration with Physical Constraints for Image-Guided Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Proceedings of SPIE–the International Society for Optical Engineering 9415 2 2015 PMC4433747 25991876
  8. [8]Al-Swiahb JN Al Dousary SH Computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective comparative study Annals of Saudi Medicine 30 2 149 152 2010 20220266 PMC2855067
  9. [9]Paraskevopoulos D Unterberg A Metzner R Dreyhaupt J Eggers G Wirtz CR Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors Neurosurgical Review 34 217 228 4 2010 21246391
  10. [10]Mirota D Wang H Taylor R Ishii M Gallia G Hager G A System for Video-Based Navigation for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 31 963 976 4 2012 22113772
  11. [11]Mirota DJ Uneri A Schafer S Nithiananthan S Reh DD Ishii M Gallia GL Taylor RH Hager GD Siewerdsen JH Evaluation of a System for High-Accuracy 3d Image-Based Registration of Endoscopic Video to C-Arm Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Skull Base Surgery IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 32 7 2013 PMC4118820 23372078
  12. [12]Quigley M Conley K Gerkey BP Faust J Foote T Leibs J Wheeler R Ng AY Ros: an open-source robot operating system ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software 2009
  13. [14]Wang H Mirota D Hager GD A Generalized Kernel Consensus-Based Robust Estimator IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 32 1 2010 PMC2857599 19926908
  14. [15]Puerto-Souza G Mariottini G-L A fast and accurate feature-matching algorithm for minimally-invasive endoscopic images Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 32 1201 1214 7 2013 23335663
  15. [17]Bradski G Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools 2000
  16. [18]Rusu RB Cousins S 3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL) IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) May 9–13 2011
  17. [19]Hartley RI Zisserman A Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision Cambridge University Press 0521540518 2 2004
  18. [21]Atcheson B Heide F Heidrich W CALTag: High precision fiducial markers for camera calibration 15th International Workshop on Vision, Modeling and Visualization November 2010
  19. [22]Mirota DJ Uneri A Schafer S Nithiananthan S Reh D Ishii M Gallia G Taylor R Hager G Siewerdsen J Evaluation of a system for high-accuracy 3d image-based registration of endoscopic video to c-arm cone-beam ct for image-guided skull base surgery Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 99 1 2013 PMC4118820 23372078

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leonard, S., Reiter, A., Sinha, A., Ishii, M., Taylor, R. H., & Hager, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins Univ. (United States)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2016-03-21
Volume
9784
Pages
97840V
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2306029903
Cited by
35
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB015530)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
functional endoscopic sinus surgery, image-guided surgery, structure from motion, CT registration, iterative closest point, point cloud registration, erectile tissue, surgical navigation, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, registration error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review