Derivation of preliminary specifications for transmitted wavefront and surface roughness for large optics used in inertial confinement fusion:
Abstract
In preparation for beginning the design of the National Ignition Facility (NIF) in the United States and the Laser Mega-Joule (LMJ) in France, we are in the process of deriving new specifications for the large optics required for these facilities. They are currently being evaluated through modeling and experimentation. These specifications will be ready for general release by the end of the year. Traditionally, specifications for transmitted wavefront and surface roughness of large ICF optics have been based on parameters which were easily measured during the early 1980s, such as peak-to-valley wavefront error (PV) and root-mean- square (rms) surface roughness, as well as wavefront gradients in terms of waves per cm. While this was convenient from a fabrication perspective, since the specifications could be easily interpreted by fabricators in terms which were understood and conventionally measurable, it did not accurately reflect the requirements of the laser system. In some cases, optics which were not adequate for a given application which was particularly sensitive to periodic errors, were fabricated acceptably in terms of the optics specifications. For the NIF and LMJ laser systems, we have availed ourselves of advances in metrology and interferometry and an enhanced understanding of laser system performance to derive specifications which are based on power spectral densities (PSDs). Such requirements can more accurately reflect the requirements of the laser system for m…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MSF errors can cause detrimental effects on optical performance including increased small angle scatter, increased downstream modulation/intensification, and reduced image contrast.
“MSF errors can cause detrimental effects on the optical performance including increased small angle scatter, increased downstream modulation/intensification, and reduced image contrast [6-11].”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing
Suratwala, T., Tham, G., Steele, R., Wong, L., Menapace, J., Ray, N., & Bauman, B. (2023) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.482739 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aikens, D. M., Roussel, A., & Bray, M.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 1995-12-08
- Volume
- 2633
- Pages
- 350-360
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963489736
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Systems and Laser Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
- Keywords
- surface roughness, power spectral density, high-energy lasers, National Ignition Facility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review