Cited by 25Optical Systems and Laser TechnologySurface Roughness and Optical MeasurementsAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing

Derivation of preliminary specifications for transmitted wavefront and surface roughness for large optics used in inertial confinement fusion:

Aikens, David M., Roussel, Andre, Bray, Michael·1995·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

In preparation for beginning the design of the National Ignition Facility (NIF) in the United States and the Laser Mega-Joule (LMJ) in France, we are in the process of deriving new specifications for the large optics required for these facilities. They are currently being evaluated through modeling and experimentation. These specifications will be ready for general release by the end of the year. Traditionally, specifications for transmitted wavefront and surface roughness of large ICF optics have been based on parameters which were easily measured during the early 1980s, such as peak-to-valley wavefront error (PV) and root-mean- square (rms) surface roughness, as well as wavefront gradients in terms of waves per cm. While this was convenient from a fabrication perspective, since the specifications could be easily interpreted by fabricators in terms which were understood and conventionally measurable, it did not accurately reflect the requirements of the laser system. In some cases, optics which were not adequate for a given application which was particularly sensitive to periodic errors, were fabricated acceptably in terms of the optics specifications. For the NIF and LMJ laser systems, we have availed ourselves of advances in metrology and interferometry and an enhanced understanding of laser system performance to derive specifications which are based on power spectral densities (PSDs). Such requirements can more accurately reflect the requirements of the laser system for m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.228287

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MSF errors can cause detrimental effects on optical performance including increased small angle scatter, increased downstream modulation/intensification, and reduced image contrast.

    “MSF errors can cause detrimental effects on the optical performance including increased small angle scatter, increased downstream modulation/intensification, and reduced image contrast [6-11].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aikens, D. M., Roussel, A., & Bray, M.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
1995-12-08
Volume
2633
Pages
350-360
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963489736
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Systems and Laser Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Keywords
surface roughness, power spectral density, high-energy lasers, National Ignition Facility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review