The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noisy lidar point clouds: impact on information extraction in high-precision lidar surveying
Abstract
LIDAR provides precise information on the objects surveyed by sequentially measuring with high accuracy. The result is a georeferenced point cloud. Every point can be described by its coordinates, attributes, and its accuracy. However, the raw point cloud is not the final product. In order to retrieve information from the point cloud additional processing is applied like classification, filtering, and modelling. LIDAR systems with focal plane arrays acquire hundreds or even thousands of range readings with a single laser pulse. This provides intermediate point clouds with a tremendous point density. However, these point clouds are frequently extremely noisy. First of all, due to the high sensitivity of the detector down to the single-photon level, the point clouds show a lot of “points in the air”. Secondly, the ranging in itself is prone to a significantly higher level of range noise compared to linear waveform LIDAR. In order to still retrieve useful information these point clouds have to be pre-processed in order to reduce noise significantly. While “points in the air” can be disposed off by applying spatial density analysis, reducing range noise can only be tackled by some sort of spatial averaging. We discuss the impact of pre-processing of raw point cloud from focal-plane LIDAR with respect to changes applied to the information content and in comparison with point clouds delivered by state-of-the-art linear waveform-processing LIDAR systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Removal of noise is considered standard practice in lidar data analysis for improving the data.
“removal of noise is considered standard practice in lidar data analysis for improving the data35”
From A singular, broadly-applicable model for estimating on- and off-path walking travel rates using airborne lidar data (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1109/ICMEW.2017.8026263 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Campbell, M. J., Cutler, S. L., & Dennison, P. E. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71359-6 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfennigbauer, M., & Ullrich, A.
- Venue
- Laser Radar Technology and Applications XXIII
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2018-05-10
- Pages
- 20
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review