Scalability in modeling and simulation systems for multi-agent, AI, and machine learning applications
Abstract
Today’s battlefield increasingly incorporates emerging technologies using artificial intelligence. These systems not only provide unparalleled speed and accuracy, but also allow for digital models to be developed and tested in simulation prior to deployment, reducing the time and cost of acquisition. This holds additional promise for wargaming modeling and simulation for understanding the impact of complex, multi-domain operations on future force efficacy and structure. However, current modeling and simulation environments are not designed for simulating decentralized, intelligent systems at scale. Cloud computing has revolutionized how we scale computational capability, but was not designed for complex, low latency interactions between independently reasoning entities. This motivates new methods for characterizing and mitigating complexity to meet operational and mission requirements. We outline the challenges and opportunities for modeling and simulating large-scale multi-agent systems and identify future research areas that should address these challenges. We recommend that investment be placed in holistically understanding scalability from a cost-benefit perspective, measuring the impact on requirements, developing improved tools for understanding the dimensions of scalability, and formalizing specifications of the scalability requirements met (or not met) by available systems. We propose that a framework for reasoning over and adjusting the fidelity of various models wit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As Agentic AI systems scale in number of agents and diversity of specialized roles, maintaining system reliability and interpretability becomes increasingly complex.
“As Agentic AI systems scale in both the number of agents and the diversity of specialized roles, maintaining system reliability and interpretability becomes increasingly complex [212,213].”
From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [213]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103599 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
“Scalability and Debugging Complexity: As Agentic AI systems scale in both the number of agents and the diversity of specialized roles, maintaining system reliability and inter-pretability becomes increasingly complex [212,213].”
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2025) · SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment · doi:10.70777/si.v2i3.15161 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
- Authors
- Newton, C., Singleton, J., Copland, C., Kitchen, S., & Hudack, J.
- Affiliations
- SoarTech (United States) (US)
- Michigan Technological University (US)
- United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Kitchen, Sarah
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications III
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2021-04-12
- Pages
- 70
- OpenAlex
- W3154314449
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- scalability, multi-agent systems, modeling and simulation, war games, artificial intelligence simulation, machine learning simulation, systems of systems, cloud computing, model fidelity, formal methods, resource optimization, cost-benefit analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review