Cited by 7Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

Communication-efficient federated learning for multi-institutional medical image classification

Open access
Zhou, Shuang, Landman, Bennett, Huo, Yuankai, Gokhale, Aniruddha·2022·Medical Imaging 2022: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) has emerged with increasing popularity in the medical image analysis field. In collaborative model training, it provides a privacy-preserving scheme by keeping data localized. In FL frameworks, instead of collecting data from clients, the server learns a global model by aggregating local training models from clients and broadcasts the updated model. However, in the situation where data is not identically and independently distributed (non-i.i.d), the model aggregation requires frequent message passing, which may face the communication bottleneck. In this paper, we propose a communication-efficient FL framework based on the adaptive server-client model transmission. The local model in the client will only be uploaded to the server under the conditions of (1) a probability threshold and (2) an informative model updating threshold. Our framework also tackles the data heterogeneity in federated networks by involving a proximal term. We evaluate our approach on a simulated multi-site medical image dataset for diabetic retinopathy (DR) rating. We demonstrate that our framework not only maintains the accuracy on non-i.i.d dataset but also provides a significant reduction in communication cost compared to other FL algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2611654

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]McMahan B, Moore E, Ramage D, Hampson S, and y Arcas BA, “ Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” in [ Artificial intelligence and statistics], 1273– 1282, PMLR (2017).
  2. [8]Yurochkin M, Agarwal M, Ghosh S, Greenewald K, Hoang N, and Khazaeni Y, “ Bayesian non-parametric federated learning of neural networks,” in [ International Conference on Machine Learning], 7252– 7261, PMLR (2019).
  3. [9]Li Q, He B, and Song D, “ Model-contrastive federated learning,” in [ Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition], 10713– 10722 (2021).

Authors
Zhou, S., Landman, B., Huo, Y., & Gokhale, A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Medical Imaging 2022: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2022-04-04
Volume
12037
Pages
2
OpenAlex
W4225538689
Cited by
7
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SPIE Medical Imaging: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB017230)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
non-IID data, data heterogeneity, medical image classification, diabetic retinopathy grading, multi-institutional collaboration, model aggregation, privacy preservation, proximal term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review