Cited by 5Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationAutomated Road and Building ExtractionInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Advanced deep learning architectures for accurate detection of subsurface tile drainage pipes from remote sensing images

Open access
Breitkopf, Tom-Lukas, Hackel, Leonard, Ravanbakhsh, Mahdyar, Cooke, Anne-Karin, Willkommen, Sandra, Broda, Stefan, Demir, Begüm·2022·Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXVIII

Abstract

Subsurface tile drainage pipes provide agronomic, economic and environmental benefits. By lowering the water table of wet soils, they improve the aeration of plant roots and ultimately increase the productivity of farmland. They do however also provide an entryway of agrochemicals into subsurface water bodies and increase nutrition loss in soils. For maintenance and infrastructural development, accurate maps of tile drainage pipe locations and drained agricultural land are needed. However, these maps are often outdated or not present. Different remote sensing (RS) image processing techniques have been applied over the years with varying degrees of success to overcome these restrictions. Recent developments in deep learning (DL) techniques improve upon the conventional techniques with machine learning segmentation models. In this study, we introduce two DL-based models: i) improved U-Net architecture; and ii) Visual Transformer-based encoder-decoder in the framework of tile drainage pipe detection. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of both models in terms of detection accuracy when compared to a basic U-Net architecture. Our code and models are publicly available at https: //git.tu-berlin.de/rsim/drainage-pipes-detection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2636263

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Breitkopf, T.-L., Hackel, L., Ravanbakhsh, M., Cooke, A.-K., Willkommen, S., Broda, S., & Demir, B.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (DE)
Venue
Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXVIII
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2022-10-26
Pages
24
OpenAlex
W4307321032
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Image and signal processing for remote sensing. Conference (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Automated Road and Building Extraction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
pipe detection, remote sensing images, improved U-Net, vision transformer, encoder-decoder architecture, image segmentation, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review