Cited by 4Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingSurgical Simulation and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TensorRT-based surgical instrument detection assessment for deep learning on edge computing

Belhaoua, Abdelkrim, Kimpe, Tom R., Crul, Stijn·2024·Medical Imaging 2024: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling

Abstract

The rise of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can mainly be attributed to the exponential growth in technology and the evolution of laparoscopic instrumentation over the past two decades. However, advanced technologies in the Operating Theatre, such as imaging systems, robotics, computer assistance, navigation, and monitoring, involve significant effort and a very high level of training and education. Deep Learning has had a major impact on a range of surgical procedures, such as optimizing workflow, surgical training, intraoperative assistance, patient safety, and efficiency. However, it also requires high computational and memory resources. There has been a lot of research into optimizing deep learning models to balance performance and accuracy under limited resources. Techniques like post-training quantization can significantly reduce model size and latency. In this paper, we explore TensorRT-based techniques on edge devices to achieve real-time inference without compromising accuracy under limited compute. For this purpose, a YOLOv5 model is pretrained on M2CAI 2016, to detect and recognize surgical instruments in Laparoscopy and evaluated using mean average precision (mAP) and inference time. We deployed object detection models on an edge device to test real-time performance, exploring the trade-off between accuracy and speed. This paper gives a review looking at how deep learning and edge computing intersect and how to optimize deep learning for edge devices with limited…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.3004788

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1007/s00534-009-0120-8 · DOI
  2. Vitiello, 2012, Introduction to robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (MIS), Medical Robotics Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1
  3. 10.3390/computation11030052 · DOI
  4. 10.48550/arXiv.1907.10701 · DOI
  5. 10.48550/arXiv.1810.05358 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TMI.2016.2593957 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Belhaoua, A., Kimpe, T. R., & Crul, S.
Affiliations
Barco (Belgium) (BE)
Venue
Medical Imaging 2024: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2024-03-29
Pages
58
OpenAlex
W4391908362
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SPIE Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
surgical instrument detection, TensorRT, edge computing, YOLOv5, post-training quantization, minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopy, real-time inference, model optimization, speed-accuracy trade-off

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review