An improved SCOT double weighted quadratic correlation time delay estimation algorithm based on infrasound signal
Abstract
In the pipeline leak location technology by detecting Infrasound signals, time delay estimation algorithm has become a significant method, but the quality of time delay estimation calculation method determines the accuracy of location. This article proposes an improved Smooth Coherent Transform (SCOT) generalized weight function based on the quadratic correlation delay estimation algorithm, defined as SCOT-γ to suppress the false peak of the signal by adding weight to the SCOT weight function , the two cross-correlations in the quadratic cross-correlation algorithm are weighted separately with the improved weight function. In this paper, MATLAB is used for experimental simulation. First, Infrasound signals with Gaussian white noise are constructed,then the influence of the weighting factor on the delay estimation performance is verified through multiple experiments, and the optimal value of the weighting factor γ is determined at the same time. Then perform cross correlation peak detection on the SCOT primary weighting method, SCOT-γ once weighting method, and SCOT-γ double weighting method and compare the noise reduction effect; finally, compare the performance of the three algorithms by calculating the root mean square error of the delay value of the three algorithms. The results show that the improved SCOT double weighted quadratic correlation time delay estimation algorithm has better anti-noise performance and higher precision.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional weighting functions and the generalized cross-correlation algorithm have limited time delay estimation effect at a low SNR.
“Due to the limited time delay estimation effect of the traditional weighting function and generalized cross-correlation algorithm at a low SNR, many scholars have studied various improved weighting functions [7,8,9,10].”
From Research on the Improvement of the Signal Time Delay Estimation Method of Acoustic Positioning for Anti-Low Altitude UAVs (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, M., Yu, J., & Yang, Z. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25092735 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jiang, A., & Liu, W.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Dianji University (CN)
- ORCID
- Liu, Wenhong
- Venue
- Third International Conference on Electronics, Electrical and Information Engineering (ICEEIE 2023)
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2023-10-27
- Pages
- 12
- OpenAlex
- W4388189760
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Electronics, Electrical and Information Engineering (ICEEIE) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Water Systems and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
- Keywords
- time delay estimation, false peak suppression, noise reduction, Gaussian white noise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review