Analysis of scattered light for VISTA
Abstract
VISTA is the Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy that has been designed by the UK ATC. The design incorporates two cameras covering the visible and near-IR wavelengths. An important concern in designing the telescope and cameras is the level of stray, scattered and background light. In the IR camera, K-band (approx. 2.0-2.3 microns) thermal emission from the telescope structure contributes ~50% of the sky background. Therefore a cold baffle is necessary. Due to the large field-of-view, and size of the required optics, a cold stop is precluded. Therefore baffling is provided by a long cryostat and a system of cold baffles with a coating that must absorb in-band light but reflect thermal radiation from the cryostat window, thus reducing the thermal load on the cryostat. In addition, the temporally and spatially variable OH airglow from the atmosphere is obscured by a warm (and hence non-absorbing) annular baffle around the secondary mirror. We report here on the modelling of the scattered and background light for VISTA. The model includes accurate models for the geometry of baffles and optical surface properties of all surfaces in the system. The optical specification is taken from a ZEMAX model and imported into TracePro to generate a fully three-dimensional telescope model, with a simple dome. For both cameras the analysis has been done for the case of scattered light from a full moon at various incident angles from 0 degrees (on axis) to 65 degrees. It is shown that a reflective baffle around the secondary mirror does not significantly impair the performance of the visible camera. Ghosting from bright stars in the field has also been calculated for both cameras. Results indicate that the level of scattered and ghosts is below the limits specified for VISTA.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing solutions for ghosting and scattered light are usually built for a specific telescope or camera.
“Although some solutions to these problems exist (Patterson & Wells 2003; Kent 2013), they are usually built for a specific telescope or camera.”
From A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys (2026) · cites this paper as Patterson & Wells 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys
Luo, Y., Myers, A. D., Drlica-Wagner, A., Dematties, D., Borchani, S., Valdes, F., Dey, A., Schlegel, D., Zhou, R., & DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys Team (2026) · The Open Journal of Astrophysics · doi:10.33232/001c.158430 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Patterson, B. A., & Wells, M.
- Affiliations
- Royal Observatory (GB)
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 4842
- Pages
- 116
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029650197
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced optical system design
- Keywords
- VISTA telescope, scattered light, stray light, background illumination, cryostat, OH airglow, ghosting, visible camera, near-infrared camera, Zemax, TracePro
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review