The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of artificial "gummy" fingers on fingerprint systems:
Abstract
Potential threats caused by something like real fingers, which are called fake or artificial fingers, should be crucial for authentication based on fingerprint systems. Security evaluation against attacks using such artificial fingers has been rarely disclosed. Only in patent literature, measures, such as live and well detection, against fake fingers have been proposed. However, the providers of fingerprint systems usually do not mention whether or not these measures are actually implemented in emerging fingerprint systems for PCs or smart cards or portable terminals, which are expected to enhance the grade of personal authentication necessary for digital transactions. As researchers who are pursuing secure systems, we would like to discuss attacks using artificial fingers and conduct experimental research to clarify the reality. This paper reports that gummy fingers, namely artificial fingers that are easily made of cheap and readily available gelatin, were accepted by extremely high rates by 11 particular fingerprint devices with optical or capacitive sensors. We have used the molds, which we made by pressing our live fingers against them or by processing fingerprint images from prints on glass surfaces, etc. We describe how to make the molds, and then show that the gummy fingers, which are made with these molds, can fool the fingerprint devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An introduction to biometric recognition
Jain, A. K., Ross, A., & Prabhakar, S. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2003.818349 · Cited by 4,974
The Quest to Replace Passwords: A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Web Authentication Schemes
Bonneau, J., Herley, C., Oorschot, P. C. V., & Stajano, F. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2012.44 · Cited by 1,110
Biometric recognition: security and privacy concerns
Prabhakar, S., Pankanti, S., & Jain, A. K. (2003) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msecp.2003.1193209 · Cited by 1,091
Zhang (2020) · doi:10.1145/3432192 · Cited by 126
Stajano, F. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25867-1_6 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsumoto, T., Matsumoto, H., Yamada, K., & Hoshino, S.
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2002-04-18
- Volume
- 4677
- Pages
- 275-289
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130817593
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of artificial "gummy" fingers on fingerprint systems:. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.462719
- The paper
- Matsumoto, T., Matsumoto, H., Yamada, K., & Hoshino, S. (2002). Impact of artificial "gummy" fingers on fingerprint systems:. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.462719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.