The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved time bounds for near-optimal sparse Fourier representations
Abstract
•We study the problem of finding a Fourier representation R of m terms for a given discrete signal A of length N. The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) can find the optimal N-term representation in time O(N log N) time, but our goal is to get sublinear time algorithms when m << N. Suppose ||A||2 ≤M||A-Ropt||2, where Ropt is the optimal output. The previously best known algorithms output R such that ||A-R||22≤(1+ε))||A-Ropt||22 with probability at least 1-δ in time* poly(m,log(1/δ),log N,log M,1/ε). Although this is sublinear in the input size, the dominating expression is the polynomial factor in m which, for published algorithms, is greater than or equal to the bottleneck at m2 that we identify below. Our experience with these algorithms shows that this is serious limitation in theory and in practice. Our algorithm beats this m2 bottleneck. Our main result is a significantly improved algorithm for this problem and the d-dimensional analog. Our algorithm outputs an R with the same approximation guarantees but it runs in time m•poly(log(1/δ),log N,log M,1/ε). A version of the algorithm holds for all N, though the details differ slightly according to the factorization of N. For the d-dimensional problem of size N1 × N2 × •• × Nd, the linear-in-m algorithm extends efficiently to higher dimensions for certain factorizations of the Ni's; we give a quadratic-in-m algorithm that works for any values of Ni's. This article replaces several earlier, unpublished drafts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Introduction To Compressive Sampling
Candes, E. J., & Wakin, M. B. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2007.914731 · Cited by 10,017
Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements
Candès, E. J., Romberg, J. K., & Tao, T. (2006) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20124 · Cited by 7,036
Beyond Nyquist: Efficient Sampling of Sparse Bandlimited Signals
Tropp, J. A., Laska, J. N., Duarte, M. F., Romberg, J. K., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2034811 · Cited by 1,089
Data Streams: Algorithms and Applications
Muthukrishnan, S. (2005) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000002 · Cited by 718
Self-citationOne sketch for all: fast algorithms for compressed sensing
Gilbert, A. C., Strauss, M. J., Tropp, J. A., & Vershynin, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1250790.1250824 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, A. C., Muthukrishnan, S., & Strauss, M.
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2005-08-18
- Volume
- 5914
- Pages
- 59141A
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986545790
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved time bounds for near-optimal sparse Fourier representations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.615931
- The paper
- Gilbert, A. C., Muthukrishnan, S., & Strauss, M. (2005). Improved time bounds for near-optimal sparse Fourier representations. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.615931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.