The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biometric template transformation: a security analysis
Abstract
One of the critical steps in designing a secure biometric system is protecting the templates of the users that are stored either in a central database or on smart cards. If a biometric template is compromised, it leads to serious security and privacy threats because unlike passwords, it is not possible for a legitimate user to revoke his biometric identifiers and switch to another set of uncompromised identifiers. One methodology for biometric template protection is the template transformation approach, where the template, consisting of the features extracted from the biometric trait, is transformed using parameters derived from a user specific password or key. Only the transformed template is stored and matching is performed directly in the transformed domain. In this paper, we formally investigate the security strength of template transformation techniques and define six metrics that facilitate a holistic security evaluation. Furthermore, we analyze the security of two wellknown template transformation techniques, namely, Biohashing and cancelable fingerprint templates based on the proposed metrics. Our analysis indicates that both these schemes are vulnerable to intrusion and linkage attacks because it is relatively easy to obtain either a close approximation of the original template (Biohashing) or a pre-image of the transformed template (cancelable fingerprints). We argue that the security strength of template transformation techniques must consider also consider the com…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biometric identifiers are often touted as being both unique and singular to one identity, but biometric templates are limited to approximate representations.
“If we discount possible errors and inaccuracies related to the technology (Proença and Alexandre, 2010; Canham, 2018), biometric identifiers are often touted as being both unique and singular to one identity. However, biometric templates are limited to the extent that even the most sophisticated scanning tools only provide approximate representations (Nagar et al., 2010).”
From Self-Sovereign Identity in a Globalized World: Credentials-Based Identity Systems as a Driver for Economic Inclusion (2020) · cites this paper as Nagar et al., 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, F., & De Filippi, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00028 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagar, A., Nandakumar, K., & Jain, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Korea University (KR)
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2010-02-04
- Volume
- 7541
- Pages
- 75410O
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009360064
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Keywords
- biometric template protection, template protection, BioHashing, linkage attacks, security metrics, biometric privacy, smart cards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review