Cited by 167Biometric Identification and SecurityUser Authentication and Security SystemsGait Recognition and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biometric template transformation: a security analysis

Abstract

One of the critical steps in designing a secure biometric system is protecting the templates of the users that are stored either in a central database or on smart cards. If a biometric template is compromised, it leads to serious security and privacy threats because unlike passwords, it is not possible for a legitimate user to revoke his biometric identifiers and switch to another set of uncompromised identifiers. One methodology for biometric template protection is the template transformation approach, where the template, consisting of the features extracted from the biometric trait, is transformed using parameters derived from a user specific password or key. Only the transformed template is stored and matching is performed directly in the transformed domain. In this paper, we formally investigate the security strength of template transformation techniques and define six metrics that facilitate a holistic security evaluation. Furthermore, we analyze the security of two wellknown template transformation techniques, namely, Biohashing and cancelable fingerprint templates based on the proposed metrics. Our analysis indicates that both these schemes are vulnerable to intrusion and linkage attacks because it is relatively easy to obtain either a close approximation of the original template (Biohashing) or a pre-image of the transformed template (cancelable fingerprints). We argue that the security strength of template transformation techniques must consider also consider the com…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.839976

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biometric identifiers are often touted as being both unique and singular to one identity, but biometric templates are limited to approximate representations.

    “If we discount possible errors and inaccuracies related to the technology (Proença and Alexandre, 2010; Canham, 2018), biometric identifiers are often touted as being both unique and singular to one identity. However, biometric templates are limited to the extent that even the most sophisticated scanning tools only provide approximate representations (Nagar et al., 2010).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nagar, A., Nandakumar, K., & Jain, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • Korea University (KR)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2010-02-04
Volume
7541
Pages
75410O
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009360064
Cited by
167
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
biometric template protection, template protection, BioHashing, linkage attacks, security metrics, biometric privacy, smart cards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review