Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

4MOST: 4-metre multi-object spectroscopic telescope

Open access
de Jong, Roelof S., Bellido-Tirado, Olga, Chiappini, Cristina, Depagne, Éric, Haynes, Roger, Johl, Diana, Schnurr, Olivier, Schwope, Axel, Walcher, Jakob, Dionies, Frank, Haynes, Dionne, Kelz, Andreas, Kitaura, Francisco S., Lamer, Georg, Minchev, Ivan, Müller, Volker, Nuza, Sebastián E., Olaya, Jean-Christophe, Piffl, Tilmann, Popow, Emil, Steinmetz, Matthias, Ural, Ugur, Williams, Mary, Winkler, Roland, Wisotzki, Lutz, Ansorge, Wolfgang R., Banerji, Manda, Gonzalez Solares, Eduardo, Irwin, Mike, Kennicutt, Robert C., King, Dave, McMahon, Richard G., Koposov, Sergey, Parry, Ian R., Sun, David, Walton, Nicholas A., Finger, Gert, Iwert, Olaf, Krumpe, Mirko, Lizon, Jean-Louis, Vincenzo, Mainieri, Amans, Jean-Philippe, Bonifacio, Piercarlo, Cohen, Mathieu, Francois, Patrick, Jagourel, Pascal, Mignot, Shan B., Royer, Frédéric, Sartoretti, Paola, Bender, Ralf, Grupp, Frank, Hess, Hans-Joachim, Lang-Bardl, Florian, Muschielok, Bernard, Böhringer, Hans, Boller, Thomas, Bongiorno, Angela, Brusa, Marcella, Dwelly, Tom, Merloni, Andrea, Nandra, Kirpal, Salvato, Mara, Pragt, Johannes H., Navarro, Ramón, Gerlofsma, Gerrit, Roelfsema, Ronald, Dalton, Gavin B., Middleton, Kevin F., Tosh, Ian A., Boeche, Corrado, Caffau, Elisabetta, Christlieb, Norbert, Grebel, Eva K., Hansen, Camilla, Koch, Andreas, Ludwig, Hans-G., Quirrenbach, Andreas, Sbordone, Luca, Seifert, Walter, Thimm, Guido, Trifonov, Trifon, Helmi, Amina, Trager, Scott C., Feltzing, Sofia, Korn, Andreas, Boland, Wilfried·2012·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

The 4MOST consortium is currently halfway through a Conceptual Design study for ESO with the aim to develop a wide-field ( < 3 square degree, goal < 5 square degree), high-multiplex ( < 1500 fibres, goal 3000 fibres) spectroscopic survey facility for an ESO 4m-class telescope (VISTA). 4MOST will run permanently on the telescope to perform a 5 year public survey yielding more than 20 million spectra at resolution R∼5000 (λ=390–1000 nm) and more than 2 million spectra at R~20,000 (395–456.5 nm and 587–673 nm). The 4MOST design is especially intended to complement three key all-sky, space-based observatories of prime European interest: Gaia, eROSITA and Euclid. Initial design and performance estimates for the wide-field corrector concepts are presented. Two fibre positioner concepts are being considered for 4MOST. The first one is a Phi-Theta system similar to ones used on existing and planned facilities. The second one is a new R-Theta concept with large patrol area. Both positioner concepts effectively address the issues of fibre focus and pupil pointing. The 4MOST spectrographs are fixed configuration two-arm spectrographs, with dedicated spectrographs for the high- and low-resolution fibres. A full facility simulator is being developed to guide trade-off decisions regarding the optimal field-of-view, number of fibres needed, and the relative fraction of high-to-low resolution fibres. The simulator takes mock catalogues with template spectra from Design Reference Surveys as starting point, calculates the output spectra based on a throughput simulator, assigns targets to fibres based on the capabilities of the fibre positioner designs, and calculates the required survey time by tiling the fields on the sky. The 4MOST consortium aims to deliver the full 4MOST facility by the end of 2018 and start delivering high-level data products for both consortium and ESO community targets a year later with yearly increments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.926239

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
de Jong, R. S., Bellido-Tirado, O., Chiappini, C., Depagne, É., Haynes, R., Johl, D., Schnurr, O., Schwope, A., Walcher, J., Dionies, F., Haynes, D., Kelz, A., Kitaura, F. S., Lamer, G., Minchev, I., Müller, V., Nuza, S. E., Olaya, J.-C., Piffl, T., Popow, E., Steinmetz, M., Ural, U., Williams, M., Winkler, R., Wisotzki, L., Ansorge, W. R., Banerji, M., Gonzalez Solares, E., Irwin, M., Kennicutt, R. C., King, D., McMahon, R. G., Koposov, S., Parry, I. R., Sun, D., Walton, N. A., Finger, G., Iwert, O., Krumpe, M., Lizon, J.-L., Vincenzo, M., Amans, J.-P., Bonifacio, P., Cohen, M., Francois, P., Jagourel, P., Mignot, S. B., Royer, F., Sartoretti, P., Bender, R., Grupp, F., Hess, H.-J., Lang-Bardl, F., Muschielok, B., Böhringer, H., Boller, T., Bongiorno, A., Brusa, M., Dwelly, T., Merloni, A., Nandra, K., Salvato, M., Pragt, J. H., Navarro, R., Gerlofsma, G., Roelfsema, R., Dalton, G. B., Middleton, K. F., Tosh, I. A., Boeche, C., Caffau, E., Christlieb, N., Grebel, E. K., Hansen, C., Koch, A., Ludwig, H.-G., Quirrenbach, A., Sbordone, L., Seifert, W., Thimm, G., Trifonov, T., Helmi, A., Trager, S. C., Feltzing, S., Korn, A., & Boland, W.
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2012-10-05
Volume
8446
Pages
84460T
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951455563
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
13.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 4MOST: 4-metre multi-object spectroscopic telescope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.926239
The paper
de Jong, R. S., Bellido-Tirado, O., Chiappini, C., Depagne, É., Haynes, R., Johl, D., Schnurr, O., Schwope, A., Walcher, J., Dionies, F., Haynes, D., Kelz, A., Kitaura, F. S., Lamer, G., Minchev, I., Müller, V., Nuza, S. E., Olaya, J.-C., Piffl, T., . . . Boland, W. (2012). 4MOST: 4-metre multi-object spectroscopic telescope. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.926239

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.