Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intraoperative cone‐beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C‐arm prototype

Daly, M. J., Siewerdsen, J. H., Moseley, D. J., Jaffray, D. A., Irish, J. C.·2006·Medical Physics

Abstract

Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) with a flat‐panel detector represents a promising modality for intraoperative imaging in interventional procedures, demonstrating sub‐mm three‐dimensional (3D) spatial resolution and soft‐tissue visibility. Measurements of patient dose and in‐room exposure for CBCT‐guided head and neck surgery are reported, and the 3D imaging performance as a function of dose and other acquisition/reconstruction parameters is investigated. Measurements were performed on a mobile isocentric C‐arm (Siemens PowerMobil) modified in collaboration with Siemens Medical Solutions (Erlangen, Germany) to provide flat‐panel CBCT. Imaging dose was measured in a custom‐built cylindrical head phantom at four positions (isocenter, anterior, posterior, and lateral) as a function of kVp and C‐arm trajectory (“tube‐under” and “tube‐over” half‐rotation orbits). At , for example (“tube‐under” orbit), the imaging dose was 0.059 (isocenter), 0.022 (anterior), 0.10 (posterior), and 0.056 (lateral) mGy/mAs, with scans at and typical for visualization of bony and soft‐tissue structures, respectively. Dose to radiosensitive structures (viz., the eyes and thyroid) were considered in particular: significant dose sparing to the eyes (a factor of 5) was achieved using a “tube‐under” (rather than “tube‐over”) half‐rotation orbit; a thyroid shield ( Pb‐equivalent) gave moderate reduction in thyroid dose due to x‐ray scatter outside the primary field of view. In‐room exposure was measured at positions around the operating table and up to from isocenter. A typical CBCT scan ( to isocenter) gave in‐air exposure ranging from at from isocenter, to at from isocenter. Three‐dimensional (3D) image quality was assessed in CBCT reconstructions of an anthropomorphic head phantom containing contrast‐detail spheres and a natural human skeleton. The contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated across a broad range of dose . CNR increased as the square root of dose, with excellent visualization of bony and soft‐tissue structures achieved at and , respectively. The prototype C‐arm demonstrates CBCT image quality sufficient for guidance of head and neck procedures based on soft‐tissue and bony anatomy at dose levels low enough for repeat intraoperative imaging, with total dose over the course of the procedure comparable to or less than the effective dose of a typical diagnostic CT of the head.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1118/1.2349687

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Daly, M. J., Siewerdsen, J. H., Moseley, D. J., Jaffray, D. A., & Irish, J. C.
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-25
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
3767-3780
ISSN
  • 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4209
OpenAlex
W1993323376
Cited by
207
References
0
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraoperative cone‐beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C‐arm prototype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.2349687
The paper
Daly, M. J., Siewerdsen, J. H., Moseley, D. J., Jaffray, D. A., & Irish, J. C. (2006). Intraoperative cone‐beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C‐arm prototype. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2349687

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.