The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraoperative cone‐beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C‐arm prototype
Abstract
Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) with a flat‐panel detector represents a promising modality for intraoperative imaging in interventional procedures, demonstrating sub‐mm three‐dimensional (3D) spatial resolution and soft‐tissue visibility. Measurements of patient dose and in‐room exposure for CBCT‐guided head and neck surgery are reported, and the 3D imaging performance as a function of dose and other acquisition/reconstruction parameters is investigated. Measurements were performed on a mobile isocentric C‐arm (Siemens PowerMobil) modified in collaboration with Siemens Medical Solutions (Erlangen, Germany) to provide flat‐panel CBCT. Imaging dose was measured in a custom‐built cylindrical head phantom at four positions (isocenter, anterior, posterior, and lateral) as a function of kVp and C‐arm trajectory (“tube‐under” and “tube‐over” half‐rotation orbits). At , for example (“tube‐under” orbit), the imaging dose was 0.059 (isocenter), 0.022 (anterior), 0.10 (posterior), and 0.056 (lateral) mGy/mAs, with scans at and typical for visualization of bony and soft‐tissue structures, respectively. Dose to radiosensitive structures (viz., the eyes and thyroid) were considered in particular: significant dose sparing to the eyes (a factor of 5) was achieved using a “tube‐under” (rather than “tube‐over”) half‐rotation orbit; a thyroid shield ( Pb‐equivalent) gave moderate reduction in thyroid dose due to x‐ray scatter outside the primary field of view. In‐room exposure was measured at positions around the operating table and up to from isocenter. A typical CBCT scan ( to isocenter) gave in‐air exposure ranging from at from isocenter, to at from isocenter. Three‐dimensional (3D) image quality was assessed in CBCT reconstructions of an anthropomorphic head phantom containing contrast‐detail spheres and a natural human skeleton. The contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated across a broad range of dose . CNR increased as the square root of dose, with excellent visualization of bony and soft‐tissue structures achieved at and , respectively. The prototype C‐arm demonstrates CBCT image quality sufficient for guidance of head and neck procedures based on soft‐tissue and bony anatomy at dose levels low enough for repeat intraoperative imaging, with total dose over the course of the procedure comparable to or less than the effective dose of a typical diagnostic CT of the head.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sidky, E. Y., & Pan, X. (2008) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 · Cited by 1,995
Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology
Ludlow, J. B., & Ivanovic, M. (2008) · Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology · doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018 · Cited by 872
Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT)
Kalender, W. A., & Kyriakou, Y. (2007) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0651-9 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Daly, M. J., Siewerdsen, J. H., Moseley, D. J., Jaffray, D. A., & Irish, J. C.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-25
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3767-3780
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W1993323376
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraoperative cone‐beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C‐arm prototype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.2349687
- The paper
- Daly, M. J., Siewerdsen, J. H., Moseley, D. J., Jaffray, D. A., & Irish, J. C. (2006). Intraoperative cone‐beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C‐arm prototype. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2349687
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.