Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Choosing the optimal fit function: Comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the F‐test

Glatting, Gerhard, Kletting, Peter, Reske, Sven N., Hohl, Kathrin, Ring, Christina·2007·Medical Physics

Abstract

In many circumstances of data fitting one has to choose the optimal fitting function or model among several alternatives. Criteria or tests on which this decision is based are necessary and have to be well selected. In this preliminary analysis the application of the corrected Akaike information criterion is demonstrated considering the example of determining pharmacokinetic parameters for the blood serum time activity curves of ‐labeled anti‐CD66 antibody. Another model selection criterion, the F‐test, is used for comparison. For the investigated data the corrected Akaike information criterion has proved to be an effective and efficient approach, applicable to nested and non‐nested models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1118/1.2794176

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Glatting, G., Kletting, P., Reske, S. N., Hohl, K., & Ring, C.
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-18
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
4285-4292
ISSN
  • 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4209
OpenAlex
W1999109251
Cited by
244
References
1
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choosing the optimal fit function: Comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the F‐test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.2794176
The paper
Glatting, G., Kletting, P., Reske, S. N., Hohl, K., & Ring, C. (2007). Choosing the optimal fit function: Comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the F‐test. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2794176

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.