The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds
Abstract
The concept of magnetic susceptibility is central to many current research and development activities in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); for example, the development of MR‐guided surgery has created a need for surgical instruments and other devices with susceptibility tailored to the MR environment; susceptibility effects can lead to position errors of up to several millimeters in MR‐guided stereotactic surgery; and the variation of magnetic susceptibility on a microscopic scale within tissues contributes to MR contrast and is the basis of functional MRI. The magnetic aspects of MR compatibility are discussed in terms of two levels of acceptability: Materials with the first kind of magnetic field compatibility are such that magnetic forces and torques do not interfere significantly when the materials are used within the magnetic field of the scanner; materials with the second kind of magnetic field compatibility meet the more demanding requirement that they produce only negligible artifacts within the MR image and their effect on the positional accuracy of features within the image is negligible or can readily be corrected. Several materials exhibiting magnetic field compatibility of the second kind have been studied and a group of materials that produce essentially no image distortion, even when located directly within the imaging field of view, is identified. Because of demagnetizing effects, the shape and orientation, as well as the susceptibility, of objects within and adjacent to the imaging region is important in MRI. The quantitative use of susceptibility data is important to MRI, but the use of literature values for the susceptibility of materials is often difficult because of inconsistent traditions in the definitions and units used for magnetic parameters—particularly susceptibility. The uniform use of SI units for magnetic susceptibility and related quantities would help to achieve consistency and avoid confusion in MRI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging
Haacke, E. M., Cheng, N. Y. C., House, M. J., Liu, Q., Neelavalli, J., Ogg, R. J., Khan, A., Ayaz, M., Kirsch, W., & Obenaus, A. (2005) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.001 · Cited by 995
Metal-Induced Artifacts in MRI
Hargreaves, B. A., Worters, P. W., Pauly, K. B., Pauly, J. M., Koch, K. M., & Gold, G. E. (2011) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.11.7364 · Cited by 559
Biodegradable Metals for Cardiovascular Stents: from Clinical Concerns to Recent Zn‐Alloys
Bowen, P. K., Shearier, E. R., Zhao, S., Guillory, R. J., Zhao, F., Goldman, J., & Drelich, J. W. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201501019 · Cited by 544
Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data
Shmueli, K., de Zwart, J. A., van Gelderen, P., Li, T., Dodd, S. J., & Duyn, J. H. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22135 · Cited by 527
MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping
Bilgic, B., Pfefferbaum, A., Rohlfing, T., Sullivan, E. V., & Adalsteinsson, E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.077 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Schenck, J. F.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 815-850
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W1964318214
- Cited by
- 1,522
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.597854
- The paper
- Schenck, J. F. (1996). The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.