The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, the sophistication and complexity of clinical treatment planning and treatment planning systems has increased significantly, particularly including three‐dimensional (3D) treatment planning systems, and the use of conformal treatment planning and delivery techniques. This has led to the need for a comprehensive set of quality assurance (QA) guidelines that can be applied to clinical treatment planning. This document is the report of Task Group 53 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a comprehensive but viable program of quality assurance for modern radiotherapy treatment planning. The scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image‐based definition of patient anatomy, 3D beam descriptions for complex beams including multileaf collimator apertures, 3D dose calculation algorithms, and complex plan evaluation tools including dose volume histograms. The Task Group recommends an organizational framework for the task of creating a QA program which is individualized to the needs of each institution and addresses the issues of acceptance testing, commissioning the planning system and planning process, routine quality assurance, and ongoing QA of the planning process. This report, while not prescribing specific QA tests, provides the framework and guidance to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions
Low, D. A., Harms, W. B., Mutic, S., & Purdy, J. A. (1998) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598248 · Cited by 2,880
Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy
Icru (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,996
Nath, R., Anderson, L. L., Luxton, G., Weaver, K. A., Williamson, J. F., & Meigooni, A. S. (1995) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.597458 · Cited by 1,951
Software safety: why, what, and how
Leveson, N. G. (1986) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/7474.7528 · Cited by 471
Dose Specification for Reporting External Beam Therapy with Photons and Electrons
Wootton, P. (1979) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.594621 · Cited by 270
Automatic three‐dimensional correlation of CT‐CT, CT‐MRI, and CT‐SPECT using chamfer matching
van Herk, M., & Kooy, H. M. (1994) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.597344 · Cited by 246
Leunens, G., Menten, J. J., Weltens, C. G., Verstraete, J., & van der Schueren, E. (1993) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/0167-8140(93)90243-2 · Cited by 140
A quantitative assessment of the addition of MRI to CT-based, 3-D treatment planning of brain tumors
Haken, R. K. T., Thornton, A. F., Sandler, H. M., Lavigne, M. L., Quint, D. J., Fraass, B. A., Kessler, M. L., & McShan, D. L. (1992) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/0167-8140(92)90018-p · Cited by 124
Self-citationSpecification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners
Lin, P. P., Beck, T., Borras, C., et al. (1993) · doi:10.37206/38 · Cited by 120
Littlewood, B., & Strigini, L. (1992) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1192-62 · Cited by 71
Cited by
Brock, K. K., Mutic, S., McNutt, T. R., Li, H., & Kessler, M. L. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12256 · Cited by 881
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraass, B., Doppke, K., Hunt, M., Kutcher, G., Starkschall, G., Stern, R., & Van Dyke, J.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1773-1829
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2116272759
- Cited by
- 911
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.598373
- The paper
- Fraass, B., Doppke, K., Hunt, M., Kutcher, G., Starkschall, G., Stern, R., & Van Dyke, J. (1998). American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598373
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.