The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image‐guided neurosurgery
Abstract
We present a surgical guidance system that incorporates pre‐operative image information (e.g., MRI) with intraoperative ultrasound (US) imaging to detect and correct for brain tissue deformation during image‐guided neurosurgery (IGNS). Many interactive IGNS implementations employ pre‐operative images as a guide to the surgeons throughout the procedure. However, when a craniotomy is involved, tissue movement during a procedure can be a significant source of error in these systems. By incorporating intraoperative US imaging, the target volume can be scanned at any time, and two‐dimensional US images may be compared directly to the corresponding slice from the pre‐operative image. Homologous points may be mapped from the intraoperative to the pre‐operative image space with an accuracy of better than 2 mm, enabling the surgeon to use this information to assess the accuracy of the guidance system along with the progress of the procedure (e.g., extent of lesion removal) at any time during the operation. Anatomical features may be identified on both the pre‐operative and intraoperative images and used to generate a deformation map, which can be used to warp the pre‐operative image to match the intraoperative US image. System validation is achieved using a deformable multi‐modality imaging phantom, and preliminary clinical results are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of 3d/2d Registration Methods for Image-Guided Interventions
Markelj, P., Tomaževič, D., Likar, B., & Pernuš, F. (2012) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2010.03.005 · Cited by 746
Poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel phantoms for use in ultrasound and MR imaging
Surry, K. J. M., Austin, H. J. B., Fenster, A., & Peters, T. M. (2004) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/24/009 · Cited by 356
Self-citationComputer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery – a review and an assessment of technology
Hassfeld, S., & Mühling, J. (2001) · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1054/ijom.2000.0024 · Cited by 263
3D-2D Registration for Surgical Guidance: Effect of Projection View Angles on Registration Accuracy
Uneri, A., Otake, Y., Wang, A. S., Kleinszig, G., Vogt, S., Khanna, A. J., & Siewerdsen, J. H. (2014) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/2/271 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Comeau, R. M., Sadikot, A. F., Fenster, A., & Peters, T. M.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 787-800
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2127754037
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image‐guided neurosurgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.598942
- The paper
- Comeau, R. M., Sadikot, A. F., Fenster, A., & Peters, T. M. (2000). Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image‐guided neurosurgery. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.