The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension
Abstract
This paper describes a systematic investigation of the understanding of the concept of acceleration among students enrolled in a variety of introductory physics courses at the University of Washington. The criterion for assessing understanding of a kinematical concept is the ability to apply it successfully in interpreting simple motions of real objects. The main thrust of this study has been on the qualitative understanding of acceleration as the ratio Δv/Δt. The primary data source has been the individual demonstration interview in which students are asked specific questions about simple motions they observe. Results are reported for the success of different student populations in comparing accelerations for two simultaneous motions. Failure to make a proper comparison was due to various conceptual difficulties which are identified and described. Some implications for instruction are briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.10.020119 · Cited by 549
Learning and Instruction: An Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education
Eylon, B.-S., & Linn, M. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170256 · Cited by 371
Saying the wrong thing: improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions
Muller, D. A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2008) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00248.x · Cited by 145
Performance of ChatGPT on the test of understanding graphs in kinematics
Polverini, G., & Gregorcic, B. (2024) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010109 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physics
- Published
- 1981-03-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242-253
- ISSN
- 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2909
- OpenAlex
- W2033321073
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1119/1.12525
- The paper
- Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. American Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.