Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 778

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Local-field effects and effective-medium theory: A microscopic perspective

Aspnes, D. E.·1982·American Journal of Physics

Abstract

Standard textbook derivations of the Clausius–Mossotti (Lorentz–Lorenz) relation tend to obscure the physical origin of local-field effects by proceeding from the macroscopic dielectric function of the equivalent homogeneous system to the microscopic parameters of the model. The microscopic and macroscopic aspects can be made clearer by reversing the order, that is, by first obtaining the microscopic solution and then implementing the definition of macroscopic quantities as averages of their microscopic counterparts. This approach also leads naturally into a treatment of effective-medium theory and the description of the dielectric response of heterogeneous materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1119/1.12734

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 778

Metadata

Authors
Aspnes, D. E.
Venue
American Journal of Physics
Published
1982-08-01
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
704-709
ISSN
  • 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2909
OpenAlex
W2062427792
Cited by
778
References
0
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local-field effects and effective-medium theory: A microscopic perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1119/1.12734
The paper
Aspnes, D. E. (1982). Local-field effects and effective-medium theory: A microscopic perspective. American Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12734

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.