The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Must a Hamiltonian be Hermitian?
Open accessAbstract
A consistent physical theory of quantum mechanics can be built on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but instead satisfies the physical condition of space–time reflection symmetry (𝒫𝒯 symmetry). Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct that might explain experimental data. One would think that a quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian violates unitarity. However, if 𝒫𝒯 symmetry is not broken, it is possible to use a previously unnoticed physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite. This construction is general and works for any 𝒫𝒯-symmetric Hamiltonian. The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. This formulation does not conflict with the requirements of conventional quantum mechanics. There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mechanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians
Bender, C. M. (2007) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/70/6/r03 · Cited by 2,984
Self-citationObservation ofPT-Symmetry Breaking in Complex Optical Potentials
Guo, A., Salamo, G. J., Duchesne, D., Morandotti, R., Volatier-Ravat, M., Aimez, V., Siviloglou, G. A., & Christodoulides, D. N. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.093902 · Cited by 2,748
Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control
Deffner, S., & Campbell, S. (2017) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa86c6 · Cited by 585
Faster than Hermitian quantum mechanics
Bender, C. M., Brody, D. C., Jones, H. F., & Meister, B. K. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.040403 · Cited by 417
Self-citationPT-symmetry in honeycomb photonic lattices
Szameit, A., Rechtsman, M. C., Bahat-Treidel, O., & Segev, M. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.021806 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Bender, C. M., Brody, D. C., & Jones, H. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physics
- Published
- 2003-10-13
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1095-1102
- ISSN
- 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2909
- OpenAlex
- W1988877211
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Must a Hamiltonian be Hermitian? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1119/1.1574043
- The paper
- Bender, C. M., Brody, D. C., & Jones, H. F. (2003). Must a Hamiltonian be Hermitian? American Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1574043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.