Cited by 10Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsAtomic and Molecular PhysicsScientific Research and Discoveries

Quantum Theory

Bohm, David, Inglis, David R.·1952·American Journal of Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1119/1.1933314

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dropping the divergence term leaves a simple form of momentum density reminiscent of non-relativistic quantum theory, with the frequency operator as an important difference.

    “which is reminiscent of the momentum density in non-relativistic quantum theory [81], although the presence of the frequency operator, ω is an important difference.”

    From Optical Dirac equation (2014) · cites this paper as [81]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohm, D., & Inglis, D. R.
Affiliations
Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physics
Published
1952-11-01
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
522-523
ISSN
  • 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2909
OpenAlex
W4240256095
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Scientific Research and Discoveries
Keywords
quantum mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review