The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Rôle of Formant Transitions in Vowel Recognition
Abstract
An inventory of speechlike sounds was synthesized displaying systematic variations of the rate and direction of formant transitions. These sounds were specified by a set of vowel formant patterns selected along a continuum varying from [U] to [I] they were assigned to isolated, steady-state vowels, and to the points of zero rate of formant frequency change in symmetrical consonant-vowel-consonant syllables. The time variations of formant frequencies were made convex and concave by the choice of two consonantal frames: [w-w] and [j-j]. The results obtained in a series of vowel identification experiments indicate that a listener's categorization of the continuum varied as a function of the environment and the duration of the vowel. These findings suggest that, in the recognition of monosyllabic nonsense speech, the identity of a vowel is determined not solely by the formant-frequency pattern at the point of closest approach to target, but also by the direction and rate of adjacent formant transitions. In general, subjects adjusted their categorizations of the continuum in the consonantal contexts in such a way that complete transitions between loci and vowel target were not necessary: the transitions were permitted to undershoot the target frequencies for the vowel. In particular, the excursions of formants in the [w-w] syllables tended to be overestimated. Thus, there was a tendency for the categorizations to be made so as to compensate for the formant-frequency undershoot associated with vowel reduction [B. Lindblom, “Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 1773–1781 (1963)]. The effects observed are discussed in terms of an active model of vowel recognition, peripheral auditory analysis, distinctive features, and previously reported observations on vowel perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Young, E. D., & Sachs, M. B. (1979) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.383532 · Cited by 527
Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception
Lotto, A. J., Hickok, G. S., & Holt, L. L. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.008 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindblom, B. E. F., & Studdert-Kennedy, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1967-10-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 830-843
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2054473522
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Rôle of Formant Transitions in Vowel Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1910655
- The paper
- Lindblom, B. E. F., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). On the Rôle of Formant Transitions in Vowel Recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1910655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.