The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effectiveness of linear prediction characteristics of the speech wave for automatic speaker identification and verification
Abstract
Several different parametric representations of speech derived from the linear prediction model are examined for their effectiveness for automatic recognition of speakers from their voices. Twelve predictor coefficients were determined approximately once every 50 msec from speech sampled at 10 kHz. The predictor coefficients and other speech parameters derived from them, such as the impulse response function, the autocorrelation function, the area function, and the cepstrum function were used as input to an automatic speaker-recognition system. The speech data consisted of 60 utterances, consisting of six repetitions of the same sentence spoken by 10 speakers. The identification decision was based on the distance of the test sample vector from the reference vector for different speakers in the population; the speaker corresponding to the reference vector with the smallest distance was judged to be the unknown speaker. In verification, the speaker was verified if the distance between the test sample vector and the reference vector for the claimed speaker was less than a fixed threshold. Among all the parameters investigated, the cepstrum was found to be the most effective, providing an identification accuracy of 70% for speech 50 msec in duration, which increased to more than 98% for a duration of 0.5 sec. Using the same speech data, the verification accuracy was found to be approximately 83% for a duration of 50 msec, increasing to 98% for a duration of 1 sec. In a separate study to determine the feasibility of text-independent speaker identification, an identification accuracy of 93% was achieved for speech 2 sec in duration even though the texts of the test and reference samples were different.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Speech emotion recognition using hidden Markov models
Nwe, T. L., Foo, S. W., & De Silva, L. C. (2003) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(03)00099-2 · Cited by 920
Speech recognition in noisy environments: A survey
Gong, Y. (1995) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)00059-j · Cited by 635
The cepstrum: A guide to processing
Childers, D. G., Skinner, D. P., & Kemerait, R. C. (1977) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1977.10747 · Cited by 600
An Overview of Speaker Identification: Accuracy and Robustness Issues
Togneri, R., & Pullella, D. (2011) · IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcas.2011.941079 · Cited by 263
Al-Nasheri, A., Muhammad, G., Alsulaiman, M., Ali, Z., Malki, K. H., Mesallam, T. A., & Farahat Ibrahim, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2696056 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Atal, B. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1974-06-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1304-1312
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2050693797
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of linear prediction characteristics of the speech wave for automatic speaker identification and verification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1914702
- The paper
- Atal, B. S. (1974). Effectiveness of linear prediction characteristics of the speech wave for automatic speaker identification and verification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1914702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.