The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch
Abstract
A subjective scale for the measurement of pitch was constructed from determinations of the half-value of pitches at various frequencies. This scale differs from both the musical scale and the frequency scale, neither of which is subjective. Five observers fractionated tones of 10 different frequencies at a loudness level of 60 db. From these fractionations a numerical scale was constructed which is proportional to the perceived magnitude of subjective pitch. In numbering the scale the 1000-cycle tone was assigned the pitch of 1000 subjective units (mels). The close agreement of the pitch scale with an integration of the differential thresholds (DL's) shows that, unlike the DL's for loudness, all DL's for pitch are of uniform subjective magnitude. The agreement further implies that pitch and differential sensitivity to pitch are both rectilinear functions of extent on the basilar membrane. The correspondence of the pitch scale and the experimentally determined location of the resonant areas of the basilar membrane suggests that, in cutting a pitch in half, the observer adjusts the tone until it stimulates a position half-way from the original locus to the apical end of the membrane. Measurement of the subjective size of musical intervals (such as octaves) in terms of the pitch scale shows that the intervals become larger as the frequency of the mid-point of the interval increases (except in the two highest audible octaves). This result confirms earlier judgments as to the relative size of octaves in different parts of the frequency range.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The distance between the four orbits and the P (or the NP) vowel was equated in psychophysical terms.The metric used to equate the psychophysical distance of the orbits from P and NP was the mel scale (S. S. Stevens, Volkmann, & Newman, 1937).”
From Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not (1991) · cites this paper as S. S. Stevens, Volkmann, & Newman, 1937
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stevens, S. S. (1957) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046162 · Cited by 3,388
Self-citationlibrosa: Audio and Music Signal Analysis in Python
McFee, B., Raffel, C., Liang, D., Ellis, D. P. W., McVicar, M., Battenberg, E., & Nieto, O. (2015) · Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences · doi:10.25080/majora-7b98e3ed-003 · Cited by 3,099
Kuhl, P. K. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212211 · Cited by 1,331
Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., Stolyarova, E. I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5326.684 · Cited by 1,041
Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua.
Stevens, S. S., & Galanter, E. (1957) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0043680 · Cited by 1,059
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, S. S., Volkmann, J., & Newman, E. B.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Swarthmore College (US)
- ORCID
- Volkmann, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1937-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-190
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2103869314
- Cited by
- 1,107
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Human auditory perception and evaluation
- Keywords
- Mel scale, basilar membrane, sound localization, musical intervals, frequency perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review