The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms
Abstract
Observers can detect interaural delays in three component stimuli produced by sinusoidally modulating the amplitude of a sinusoidal carrier. Interaural delays are detected in stimuli confined to a high-frequency region even in the presence of an intense, low-pass filtered noise. With 300-Hz modulation of a 3900-Hz carrier, detection of interaural delay is equally good when either the entire stimulus or just the envelope of the stimulus is delayed. In either case performance is as good as with a 300-Hz pure tone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
3-D sound for virtual reality and multimedia
Madole, D., & Begault, D. (1995) · Computer Music Journal · doi:10.2307/3680997 · Cited by 868
Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: The duplex theory of sound localization revisited
Macpherson, E. A., & Middlebrooks, J. C. (2002) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1471898 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Henning, G. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1974-01-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2149646577
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1928135
- The paper
- Henning, G. B. (1974). Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1928135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
