The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the effects of lexical frequency on the durational reduction of morphologically complex words in spoken Dutch. The hypothesis that high-frequency words are more reduced than low-frequency words was tested by comparing the durations of affixes occurring in different carrier words. Four Dutch affixes were investigated, each occurring in a large number of words with different frequencies. The materials came from a large database of face-to-face conversations. For each word containing a target affix, one token was randomly selected for acoustic analysis. Measurements were made of the duration of the affix as a whole and the durations of the individual segments in the affix. For three of the four affixes, a higher frequency of the carrier word led to shorter realizations of the affix as a whole, individual segments in the affix, or both. Other relevant factors were the sex and age of the speaker, segmental context, and speech rate. To accommodate for these findings, models of speech production should allow word frequency to affect the acoustic realizations of lower-level units, such as individual speech sounds occurring in affixes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,136
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,003
Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer
Boersma, P. (2002) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 4,417
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236
Regression Analysis by Example.
Kmenta, J., Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1980) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287213 · Cited by 3,198
Bybee, J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612886 · Cited by 2,400
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
(2001) · Typological Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/tsl.45 · Cited by 2,230
Articulatory Phonology: An Overview
Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992) · Phonetica · doi:10.1159/000261913 · Cited by 1,994
Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Bower, G. H. (1975) · Cited by 1,839
Cited by
Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density
Florian Jaeger, T. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002 · Cited by 733
The effect of sublexical and lexical frequency on speech production: an fMRI investigation
Shuster, L. I. (2009) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.06.003 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2561-2569
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1983668253
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.2011150
- The paper
- Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2011150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.