CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNeuroscience and Music Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age-related differences in discrimination of an interval separating onsets of successive tone bursts as a function of interval duration

Fitzgibbons, Peter J., Gordon-Salant, Sandra, Barrett, Jessica·2007·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
DOI 10.1121/1.2739409
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The study measured listener sensitivity to increments in the inter-onset interval (IOI) separating pairs of successive 20-ms 4000-Hz tone pulses. A silent interval between the tone pulses was adjusted across conditions to create reference tonal IOI values of 25–600ms. For each condition, a duration DL for increments of the tonal IOI was measured in listeners comprised of young normal-hearing adults and two groups of older adults with and without high-frequency hearing loss. Discrimination performance of all listeners was poorest for the shorter reference IOIs, and improved to stable levels for longer reference intervals exceeding about 200ms. Temporal sensitivity of the young listeners was significantly better than that of the elderly listeners in each condition, with the largest age-related differences observed for the shortest reference interval. Age-related differences were also observed for duration DLs measured using single 4000-Hz tone bursts set to three reference durations in the range 50–200ms. The tone DLs of all listeners were smaller than the corresponding tone-pair IOI DLs, particularly for the shorter reference stimulus durations. There were no significant performance differences observed between the older listeners with and without hearing loss for either discrimination task.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.2739409

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 1980, Aging and the Perception of Speech
  2. 2007, Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications
  3. 1990, Aging and the Auditory System

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fitzgibbons, P. J., Gordon-Salant, S., & Barrett, J.
Affiliations
  • Gallaudet University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
ORCID
Gordon-Salant, Sandra
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Publisher
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Published
2007-07-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
458-466
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
DOI
10.1121/1.2739409
OpenAlex
W2063139062
Cited by
40
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R37-AG09191, R37AG009191, R01AG009191)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
temporal resolution, age differences, older adults, high-frequency hearing loss, tone bursts, interval length, auditory temporal processing
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Auditory Perception, Auditory Threshold, Cues, Hearing Loss, High-Frequency, Humans, Pitch Discrimination, Psychoacoustics, Speech Perception, Time Perception, Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review