Cited by 19Acoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsVehicle Noise and Vibration Control

A Correction of Random Incidence Absorption Coefficients for the Angular Distribution of Acoustic Energy under Measurement Conditions

Open access
Jeong, Cheol-Ho·2009·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Most acoustic measurements are based on an assumption of ideal conditions. One such ideal condition is a diffuse and reverberant field. In practice, a perfectly diffuse sound field cannot be achieved in a reverberation chamber. Uneven incident energy density under measurement conditions can cause discrepancies between the measured value and the theoretical random incidence absorption coefficient. Therefore the angular distribution of the incident acoustic energy onto an absorber sample should be taken into account. The angular distribution of the incident energy density was simulated using the beam tracing method for various room shapes and source positions. The averaged angular distribution is found to be similar to a Gaussian distribution. As a result, an angle-weighted absorption coefficient was proposed by considering the angular energy distribution to improve the agreement between the theoretical absorption coefficient and the reverberation room measurement. The angle-weighted absorption coefficient, together with the size correction, agrees satisfactorily with the measured absorption data by the reverberation chamber method. At high frequencies and for large samples, the averaged weighting corresponds well with the measurement, whereas at low frequencies and for small panels, the relatively flat distribution agrees better.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.3081392

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The methods used include mixing FEM modeling of surface impedance with the Jeong-Thomasson correction for random incidence sound absorption coefficient simulation.

    “The methods used cover the original solution of mixing FEM modeling of the surface impedance with the application of the Jeong–Thomasson correction for random incidence sound absorption coefficient simulation.”

    From Sustainable Perforated Acoustic Wooden Panels Designed Using Third-Degree-of-Freedom Bezier Curves with Broadband Sound Absorption Coefficients (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The paper’s title identifies it as a correction of random-incidence absorption coefficients, supporting the Jeong correction component. The available indexed passages do not identify a “Jeong–Thomasson correction” or describe combining that correction with FEM surface-impedance modeling. The sentence presents the FEM combination as the citing authors’ method, rather than necessarily attributing it to Jeong. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeong, C.-H.
Affiliations
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Jeong, Cheol-Ho
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
125
Issue
4
Pages
2064-2071
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2045228436
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Keywords
diffuse sound field, reverberation chamber measurements, beam tracing, Gaussian energy distribution, size correction, room acoustics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review