The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimum signal processing for passive sonar range and bearing estimation
Abstract
Optimum signal processing for passive sonar target range and bearing estimation is discussed for the case where the sonar array consists of an M-element linear array of hydrophone point detectors whole individual outputs are corrupted by sensor-to-sensor-independent self-noises of arbitrary power spectra. By comparing the measurement error covariance matrix to the Cramér–Rao matrix bound the system performance, relative to the theoretical optimum, is determined. Further, the Cramér–Rao bound is used to determine an optimum signal processor. The optimum processor is configured as a set of M (M-1)/2 cross-correlator delay estimators (one for each hydrophone pair), followed by a Gauss–Markov estimation of the array delay vector (target steering vector), which in turn is followed by a linear weighting of the estimated delay vector elements to determine a bearing estimate and a range estimate. The processor is shown to have the Cramér–Rao matrix bound for its measurement error covariance matrix. Subject Classification: 60.30; 30.82.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Closed-form least-squares source location estimation from range-difference measurements
Smith, J., & Abel, J. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1987.1165089 · Cited by 721
Position location using wireless communications on highways of the future
Rappaport, T. S., Reed, J. H., & Woerner, B. D. (1996) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/35.544321 · Cited by 561
Time delay estimation for passive sonar signal processing
Carter, G. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1981.1163560 · Cited by 484
Time delay estimation via cross-correlation in the presence of large estimation errors
Ianniello, J. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1982.1163992 · Cited by 270
A Survey of Time Delay Estimation Performance Bounds
Sadler, B. M., & Kozick, R. J. (2006) · Fourth IEEE Workshop on Sensor Array and Multichannel Processing, 2006. · doi:10.1109/sam.2006.1706138 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Hahn, W. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1975-07-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-207
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2061735630
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimum signal processing for passive sonar range and bearing estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.380646
- The paper
- Hahn, W. R. (1975). Optimum signal processing for passive sonar range and bearing estimation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.