The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops
Abstract
Experiments on the voiced–voiceless distinction in stop consonants have shown sharp and consistent labeling functions and categorical-like discrimination functions for synthetically produced speech stimuli differing in voice-onset time (VOT). Other research has found somewhat comparable results for young infants and chinchillas as well as cross-language differences in the perception of these same synthetic stimuli. In the present paper, four experiments were carried out to investigate a possible underlying basis of these seemingly diverse results. All of the experiments employed a set of nonspeech tonal stimuli that differed in the relative onset time of their components. In the first experiment identification and discrimination functions were obtained with these signals which showed strong evidence for categorical perception: the labeling functions were sharp and consistent, the discrimination functions showed peaks and troughs which were correlated with the labeling probabilities. Other experiments provided evidence foir the presence of three distinct categories along this nonspeech stimulus continuum which were separated by narrow regions of high discriminability. Based on these findings a general account of voicing perception for stops in initial position is proposed in terms of the discriminability of differences in the temporal order of the component events at onset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1533 · Cited by 2,291
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1894649 · Cited by 913
Self-citationA new view of language acquisition
Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 · Cited by 773
Statistical phonetic learning in infants: facilitation and feature generalization
Maye, J., Weiss, D. J., & Aslin, R. N. (2008) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00653.x · Cited by 376
Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception
Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S. (1985) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03207136 · Cited by 376
Metadata
- Authors
- Pisoni, D. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1977-05-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1352-1361
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2065003703
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.381409
- The paper
- Pisoni, D. B. (1977). Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.