The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability
Abstract
This paper describes a test of everyday speech reception, in which a listener’s utilization of the linguistic-situational information of speech is assessed, and is compared with the utilization of acoustic-phonetic information. The test items are sentences which are presented in babble-type noise, and the listener response is the final word in the sentence (the key word) which is always a monosyllabic noun. Two types of sentences are used: high-predictability items for which the key word is somewhat predictable from the context, and low-predictability items for which the final word cannot be predicted from the context. Both types are included in several 50-item forms of the test, which are balanced for intelligibility, key-word familiarity and predictability, phonetic content, and length. Performance of normally hearing listeners for various signal-to-noise ratios shows significantly different functions for low- and high-predictability items. The potential applications of this test, particularly in the assessment of speech reception in the hearing impaired, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review.
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006 · Cited by 809
Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences
Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/00206097909072618 · Cited by 722
Akeroyd, M. A. (2008) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992020802301142 · Cited by 688
Obleser, J., Wise, R. J. S., Alex Dresner, M., & Scott, S. K. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4663-06.2007 · Cited by 354
Cognitive aging and auditory information processing
Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992020309074641 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., & Elliott, L. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1977-05-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1337-1351
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1981527043
- Cited by
- 1,090
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.381436
- The paper
- Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., & Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.