The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Categorical perception—phenomenon or epiphenomenon: Evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals
Abstract
Categorical perception was investigated in a series of experiments on the perception of melodic musical intervals (sequential frequency ratios). When procedures equivalent to those typically used in speech-perception experiments were employed, (i.e., determination of identification and discrimination functions for stimuli separated by equal physical increments), musical intervals were perceived categorically by trained musicians. When a variable-step-size (adaptive) discrimination procedure was used, evidence of categorical perception (in the form of smaller interval-width DL’s for ratios at identification category boundaries than for ratios within categories), although present initially, largely disappeared after subjects had reached asymptotic performance. However, equal-step-size discrimination functions obtained after observers had reached asymptotic performance in the adaptive paradigm were not substantially different from those initially obtained. The results of other experiments imply that this dependence of categorical perception on procedure may be related to differences in stimulus uncertainty between the procedures. An experiment on the perception of melodic intervals by musically untrained observers showed no evidence for the existence of ’’natural’’ categories for musical intervals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology
(2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426 · Cited by 1,632
Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context.
Krumhansl, C. L., & Shepard, R. N. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.579 · Cited by 498
Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings
REPP, B. H. (1984) · Speech and Language · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608610-2.50012-1 · Cited by 406
Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch.
Shepard, R. N. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.89.4.305 · Cited by 388
Goldstone, R. L., & Hendrickson, A. T. (2010) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.26 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Burns, E. M., & Ward, W. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1978-02-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 456-468
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2051856012
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Categorical perception—phenomenon or epiphenomenon: Evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.381737
- The paper
- Burns, E. M., & Ward, W. D. (1978). Categorical perception—phenomenon or epiphenomenon: Evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.