Cited by 431Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli

Kuhl, Patricia K., Miller, James D.·1978·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In an attempt to clearly differentiate perceptual effects that are attributable to ’’auditory’’ and ’’phonetic’’ levels of processing in speech perception we have undertaken a series of experiments with animal listeners. Four chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger) were trained to respond differently to the ’’endpoints’’ of a synthetic alveolar speech continuum (0 ms VOT and +80 ms VOT) and were then tested in a generalization paradigm with the VOT stimuli between these endpoints. The resulting identification functions were nearly identical to those obtained with adult English-speaking listeners. To test the generality of this agreement, the animals were then tested with synthetic stimuli that had labial and velar places of articulation. As a whole, the functions produced by the two species were very similar; the same relative locations of the phonetic boundaries, with lowest VOT boundaries for labial stimuli and highest for velar stimuli, were obtained for each animal and human subject. No significant differences between species on the absolute values of the phonetic boundaries were obtained, but chinchillas produced identification functions that were slightly, but significantly, less steep. These results are discussed with regard to theories of speech perception, the evolution of a speech-sound repertoire, and current interpretations of the human infant’s perceptual proclivities with regard to speech-sound perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.381770

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 431

Innateness, learning, and the development of object representation
Spelke, E. S. (1999) · Developmental Science · Cited by 17
The equivalence of cues in the perception of speech by infants
Eimas, P. D. (1985) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(85)80001-1 · Cited by 17
Auditory and Phonetic Coding of Speech
Sawusch, J. R. (1986) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-631403-8.50007-2 · Cited by 17
Speech Production and Perception
Fowler, C. A. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0409 · Cited by 19
Methods for robust characterization of consonant perception in hearing-impaired listeners
Han, W. (2011) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 16
Natural auditory sensitivities as universal determiners of phonemic contrasts
Howell, P., & Rosen, S. (1983) · Linguistics · doi:10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.205 · Cited by 16
L'acquisition du langage. Volume I
Bertoncini, J., & de Boysson-Bardies, B. (2000) · Presses Universitaires de France eBooks · doi:10.3917/puf.fayol.2000.01.0095 · Cited by 27
An ideological battle over modals and quantifiers
Piattelli‐Palmarini, M. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081280 · Cited by 16
Prosody Discrimination by Songbirds (Padda oryzivora)
Naoi, N., Watanabe, S., Maekawa, K., & Hibiya, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047446 · Cited by 15
“, chimpanzees [26]; macaques [27]; cotton-top tamarin monkeys [28]; chinchillas [29]; and rats [30,31]).”
Background
The effects of musicality and language background on cue integration in pitch perception
Cui, A., & Kuang, J. (2019) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5134442 · Cited by 17
“…measured as comparisons between the points where response rates cross over 50% for the different experimental conditions (e.g., Best et al., 1981; Kuhl and Miller, 1978), and categoricity can be estimated as some measure of boundary width or the slope of the fitted function (e.g., Kuhl and…”
Background
Phonetic Categorisation
McQueen, J. M. (1996) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909696387060 · Cited by 15
Development of the Speech Perceptuomotor System
Studdert‐Kennedy, M. (1986) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-08023-6_15 · Cited by 15
Underpinnings of explicit phonetic imitation: perception, production, and variability
Schertz, J. L., Adil, F., & Kravchuk, A. (2023) · Glossa Psycholinguistics · doi:10.5070/g601123 · Cited by 14
Perception of the short vs. long phonological category in Estonian by native and non-native listeners
Meister, L., & Meister, E. (2011) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.01.005 · Cited by 14
Anatomizing the rhinoceros
Sober, E. R. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081371 · Cited by 14
Extracting Phonetic Knowledge from Learning Systems: Perceptrons, Support Vector Machines and Linear Discriminants
Damper, R. I., Gunn, S. R., & Gore, M. O. (2000) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1023/a:1008359903796 · Cited by 14
“Figure 1 shows labeling curves 4 from [ 3 ] illustrating the warping around the category boundary and the movement of the boundary with place of articulation.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Voicing judgements by chinchillas trained with a reward paradigm
Ohlemiller, K. K., Jones, L. B., Heidbreder, A. F., Clark, W. W., & Miller, J. D. (1999) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00130-2 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Effects of syllable duration on stop-glide identification in syllable-initial and syllable-final position by humans and monkeys
Sinnott, J. M., Brown, C. H., & Borneman, M. A. (1998) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211937 · Cited by 14
Automatic discriminative measurement of voice onset time
Sonderegger, M., & Keshet, J. (2010) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2010-616 · Cited by 13
Phonemic Representations and Categories
Steinschneider, M. (2012) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2350-8_6 · Cited by 14
Which Acoustic and Phonological Factors Shape Infants’ Vowel Discrimination? Exploiting Natural Variation in InPhonDB
Tsuji, S., & Cristià, A. (2017) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-1468 · Cited by 13
“All of this experimental work assessing infants’ discrimination of vocalic sounds begs the question: What factors explain structured variance in infants’ discrimination of these sounds? Taking up the example of Eimas’ work, together with other research, it is now apparent that there are certain discontinuities in the…”
Background
Offline learning and the role of autogenous speech: new suggestions from birdsong research
Margoliash, D. (2003) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(02)00101-2 · Cited by 13
Natural selection or shareability?
Freyd, J. J. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081115 · Cited by 13
Perception and production of English /r/-/l/ by adult Japanese speakers
Hattori, K. (2010) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 13
The profile of abstract rule learning in infancy: Meta-analytic and experimental evidencePreprint
Rabagliati, H., Ferguson, B., & Lew‐Williams, C. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fdqxp · Cited by 12
The emergence of homo loquens and the laws of physics
Otero, C. P. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081267 · Cited by 11
Underlying Mechanism for Categorical Perception: Tone-Onset Time and Voice-Onset Time Evidence of Hebrew Voicing
Kishon‐Rabin, L., Rotshtein, S., & Taitelbaum‐Swead, R. (2002) · Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1515/jbcpp.2002.13.2.117 · Cited by 11
Nasals and Nasalization in Spanish and Portuguese
Goodin-Mayeda, C. E. (2016) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.9 · Cited by 14
Acoustic patterns common to human communication and communication between monkeys
Maurus, M., Barclay, D., & Streit, K.-M. (1988) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/0271-5309(88)90008-0 · Cited by 11
A Rube Goldberg machine par excellence
Gopnik, M. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081127 · Cited by 11
Beyond the roadblock in linguistic evolution studies
Hurford, J. R. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081140 · Cited by 9
Selective perception and recognition of vocal signals
(2010) · Handbook of behavioral neuroscience · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374593-4.00013-9 · Cited by 12
Toward an adaptationist psycholinguistics
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081346 · Cited by 10
Mice can learn phonetic categories
Saunders, J. L., & Wehr, M. (2019) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5091776 · Cited by 9
Perceptual cues of consonant sounds and impact of sensorineural hearing loss on speech perception
Allen, J. B., & Li, F. (2009) · Cited by 10
Communication Sounds and their Cortical Representation
Kanwal, J. S., & Ehret, G. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0074-6_16 · Cited by 11
The Extended Infant: Utterance-Activity and Distributed Cognition
Spurrett, D., & Cowley, S. J. (2010) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262014038.003.0013 · Cited by 10
Connectionist models of categorical perception of speech
Damper, R. I. (2002) · doi:10.1109/sipnn.1994.344955 · Cited by 10
In defense of exaptation
Wilkins, W. K., & Dumford, J. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0008136x · Cited by 10
Categorical Perception in Animals
Fischer, J. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00806-3 · Cited by 11
Sound categorization by crocodilians
Thévenet, J., Kehy, M., Boyer, N., Pradeau, A., Papet, L., Gaudrain, E., Grimault, N., & Mathevon, N. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106441 · Cited by 9
Auditory gap-in-noise detection behavior in ferrets and humans.
Gold, J., Nodal, F. R., Peters, F., et al. (2015) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000065 · Cited by 9
“…content of sound but also by the temporal structure of stimuli such as human speech and a wide range of animal vocalizations (Greenberg, Ainsworth, & Fay, 2004; Kuhl & Miller, 1978; Lisker & Abramson, 1964; Narins & Feng, 2006; Simmons & Fay, 2003; Sinnott & Adams, 1987; Viemeister, 2014).”
Background
Natural selection and the autonomy of syntax
Newmeyer, F. J. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081243 · Cited by 9
Arbitrariness no argument against adaption
Ridley, M. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081309 · Cited by 9
Individual and sex distinctiveness in bark calls of domestic chinchillas elicited in a distress context
Moreno‐Gómez, F. N., Alex León, I., Velásquez, N. A., Penna, M., & Delano, P. H. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4929750 · Cited by 9
Adaptive complexity in sound patterns
Lindblom, B. E. F. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081218 · Cited by 9
The Role of Early Experience in the Development of Speech Perception
Walley, A. C., Pisoni, D. B., & Aslin, R. Ν. (1981) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-065301-0.50017-0 · Cited by 9
Discovering Messages in the Medium
Best, C. T. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1660-0_4 · Cited by 10
Speech perception and the learnability of languages
Wode, H. (1994) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.1994.tb00061.x · Cited by 8
Specific Neural Traces for Intonational Discourse Categories as Revealed by Human-evoked Potentials
Borràs-Comes, J., Costa‐Faidella, J., Prieto, P., & Escera, C. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00147 · Cited by 8
“For example, animals show categorical perception (Kuhl & Miller, 1978 ), and thus, the increased MMN for across-category contrasts may reflect auditory discontinuities (eg, Holt, Lotto, & Diehl, 2004 , for VOT), that is, natural boundaries within which distinctiveness is enhanced, reflecting a warped acoustic space (K…”
Background
Frequency response areas of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus. III. Time-domain responses: Constancy, dynamics, and precision in relation to spectral resolution, and perception in the time domain
Egorova, M. A., Akimov, A. G., Khorunzhii, G. D., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240853 · Cited by 8
Phonetics
Wayland, R. P. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108289849 · Cited by 8
What would a theory of language evolution have to look like?
Jackendoff, R. S. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081152 · Cited by 9
Typology and acquisition in functional and arbitrary phonology
Boersma, P. (1998) · Cited by 8
PHONETIC AND AUDITORY TRADING RELATIONS BETWEEN ACOUSTIC CUES IN SPEECH PERCEPTION: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Repp, B. H. (1981) · Cited by 8
Animal models of speech perception phenomena
Lotto, A. J., Kluender, K. R., & Holt, L. L. (1997) · Cited by 8
Infant perception of gestural contrasts: prerequisites for the acquisition of a visually specified language
Carroll, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1986) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000900000283 · Cited by 8
On the coevolution of language and social competence
Premack, D. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081292 · Cited by 7
The Processing of Speech and Nonspeech Sounds by Infants: Some Implications
Jusczyk, P. W. (1981) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-065301-0.50016-9 · Cited by 8
O efeito dos estimulos auditivo e visual na percepção dos marcadores prosodicos lexicais e graficos usados na escrita do portugues brasileiro
Pacheco, V. (2006) · doi:10.47749/t/unicamp.2006.391098 · Cited by 8
Diazepam and ?-9-THC: contrasting effects on the discrimination of speech sounds in nonhuman primates
Hienz, R. D., & Brady, J. V. (1989) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00442820 · Cited by 8
“Chinchillas, for example, produce voice-onset-time identification functions of consonant-vowel sounds (such as/ba/versus/da/) that are quite similar to those of humans (Kuhl and Miller 1978).”
Background
Information integration in cross-modal pattern recognition: An argument for acquired modularity
Thompson, L. A., & Lee, K. M. (1996) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(95)00002-x · Cited by 8
Cocaine's effects on speech sound discriminations and reaction times in baboons
Hienz, R. D., Pyle, D. A., Brady, J. V., et al. (1995) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02246089 · Cited by 8
“Further, chinchillas produce voice-onset-time identification functions of consonant-vowel sounds (such as /ba/versus/da/) that are quite similar to those of humans (Kuhl and Miller 1978).”
Background
Acquiring Italian stop consonants: A challenge for Mandarin Chinese-speaking learners
Feng, Q., & Busà, M. G. (2022) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/02676583221079147 · Cited by 7
“…Keating et al. (1981), these category boundaries are aligned with a natural psycho-acoustic boundary, since both animals (e.g. Dooling, Okanoya and Brown, 1989; Kuhl and Miller, 1975, 1978) and infants (e.g. Eimas et al., 1971; Jusczyk et al., 1989) show similar category boundaries in perception.”
Background
The Function and Significance of Inter-Species Acoustic Cues in the Transformation of Budgerigar ( Melopsittacus Undulatus ) Sounds Into "Speech"
Sclan, J. (2012) · International Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.46867/c46k6h · Cited by 6
Should It Stay or Should It Go? A Critical Reflection on the Critical Period for Language
Balari, S., & Lorenzo, G. (2015) · Biolinguistics · doi:10.5964/bioling.9027 · Cited by 7
“Such interpretation was soon called into question when categorical perception of speech sounds was also experimentally observed in a non-human species (Kuhl & Miller 1975, 1978).”
Background
Auditory Constraints on Speech Perception
Diehl, R. L. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_16 · Cited by 7
“On the other side of the issue have been investigators such as James Miller and Patricia Kuhl (Miller et al., 1976; Kuhl & Miller, 1975; 1978), Richard Pastore (1981), David Pisoni (1977, Pisoni, Carrel & Gans, (1983) and Bert Schouten (1980), among others.”
Background
Evidence for phonological categories from speech perception
Benkí, J. R. (1998) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · Cited by 7
The genome might as well store the entire language in the environment
Ninio, A. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081255 · Cited by 6
Production of voice onset time (VOT) by senior Polish learners of English
Sypiańska, J. (2021) · Open Linguistics · doi:10.1515/opli-2021-0016 · Cited by 6
“On the other hand, they also have to take into consideration the perceptual border between the lenis and fortis stops in English that is 35 ms for /t/ and 42ms for /k/ (Kuhl and Miller 1978).”
Background
Longitudinal observations of typical English voicing acquisition in a 2-year-old child: Stability of the contrast and considerations for clinical assessment
Hitchcock, E. R., & Koenig, L. L. (2015) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2015.1083617 · Cited by 6
“Results of the pilot study, using four listeners, yielded 50% crossovers (i.e. phoneme boundaries) of 25 ms for bilabials and 35 ms for alveolars, similar to what has been observed for synthetic stimuli based on adult models (e.g. Kuhl & Miller, 1978).”
BackgroundResult
Ventral cochlear nucleus coding of voice onset time in naturally spoken syllables
Clarey, J. C., Paolini, A. G., Grayden, D. B., Burkitt, A. N., & Clark, G. M. (2004) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-5955(04)00017-6 · Cited by 7
Psychophysics versus Specialized Processes in Speech Perception: An Alternative Perspective
Massaro, D. W. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_3 · Cited by 6
Multiple Meanings of “Phoneme” (Articulatory, Acoustic, Perceptual, Graphemic) and Their Confusions
Warren, R. M. (1983) · Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608609-6.50012-8 · Cited by 6
Simulation of Neural Responses that Underlie Speech Discrimination
Sinex, D. G. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3560-7_22 · Cited by 6
Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners
Shofner, W. P. (2014) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4867362 · Cited by 5
Linguistic function and linguistic evolution
Broadwell, G. A. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081085 · Cited by 5
Behavioral vs. cognitive views of speech perception and production.
Schlinger, H. D. (2010) · The Journal of Speech and Language Pathology – Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1037/h0100271 · Cited by 5
Spraakontwikkeling in het eerste levensjaar
Beinum, F. J. K.-V., Clement, C. J., & van der Stelt, J. M. (1999) · Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-313-8642-0_28 · Cited by 5
Laminar differences in response to simple and spectro-temporally complex sounds in the primary auditory cortex of ketamine-anesthetized gerbils
Schaefer, M. K., Kössl, M., & Hechavarría, J. C. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182514 · Cited by 5
Psychophysical Boundary for Categorization of Voiced–Voiceless Stop Consonants in Native Japanese Speakers
Tamura, S., Ito, K., Hirose, N., & Mori, S. (2018) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-h-17-0131 · Cited by 5
Phonetically-driven acquisition of phonology
Boersma, P. (2000) · Cited by 5
Some consequences of the representation of words in memory
Halle, M. (1997) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/s0024-3841(96)00043-5 · Cited by 5
“3 Questions have been raised about the motor theory as a result of a series of experiments conducted by Kuhl and associates (see Kuhl and Miller (1975, 1978) Kuhl (198 l)), stop + vowel stimuli varying in Voice Onset Time (VOT) were presented to both humans and chinchillas, and it was found that…”
Background
Lexical tone perception and production : the role of language and musical background
Schwanhäuβer, B. (2007) · Cited by 5
Perceptual switching in Spanish/English bilinguals
Bohn, O., & Flege, J. E. (1988) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2025281 · Cited by 5
The Growth of Phonological Awareness: Response to Reading Intervention by Children with Reading Disabilities who Exhibit Typical or Below-Average Language Skills
Wise, J. C. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/1059880 · Cited by 4
Perception of synthetic speech sounds by the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)
Dooling, R. J., Soli, S. D., Kline, R. M., Park, T. J., Hue, C., & Bunnell, H. T. (1987) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03330308 · Cited by 4
Nasals and Nasalization in Spanish and Portuguese: Perception, phonetics and phonology
Goodin-Mayeda, C. E. (2016) · Cited by 4
The origins of emotion and language from the perspective of developmental neuropsychology
McGilchrist, I. (2015) · Consciousness & emotion book series · doi:10.1075/ceb.10.04mcg · Cited by 4
Artificial Neural Networks simulation of learning of auditory equivalence classes for vowels
Eriksson, J. L., & Villa, A. E. P. (2006) · 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2006.246727 · Cited by 4
“these boundaries reflect innate nonlinearities of the auditory system [16] many have put forward views which give greater weight to learning and general perceptual processes [17], [18], [19], [20], [21].”
Background
Is the consonant bias specifically human? Long–Evans rats encode vowels better than consonants in words
Bouchon, C., & Toro, J. M. (2019) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01280-3 · Cited by 5
Phonetics: A Practical Introduction
Wayland, R. P. (2019) · Cited by 5
Machine-assisted phonemic analysis
Kempton, T. (2012) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 4
Auditory representations of speech sounds in a neural model: the role of peripheral processing
Damper, R. I. (2002) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.1998.687201 · Cited by 4
“while Kuhl and Miller [2] write:”
Background
8 Language Development
MacWhinney, B. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy208 · Cited by 1
Language Development
MacWhinney, B. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470880166.hlsd001014 · Cited by 17
Selecting grammars
Hornstein, N. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081139 · Cited by 7
Selectivity to acoustic features of human speech in the auditory cortex of the mouse
Mohn, J. L., Baese‐Berk, M. M., & Jaramillo, S. (2023) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2023.108920 · Cited by 3
Using monkeys to explore perceptual “loss” versus “learning” models in English and Spanish voice-onset-time perception
Sinnott, J. M., Powell, L. A., & Camchong, J. (2006) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2162440 · Cited by 3
Prosody-Preserving Voice Transformation to Evaluate Brain Representations of Speech Sounds
Bedenbaugh, P. H., Sarko, D. K., Roth, H. L., et al. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2009.2035165 · Cited by 3
“Furthermore, trained animals respond to speech categorically, with categorical boundaries similar to those found in humans [30].”
Background

Authors: Kuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D.
Affiliations: Central Institute for the Deaf (US)
ORCID: Kuhl, Patricia K.
Miller, James D.
Venue: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Publisher: Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Published: 1978-03-01
Volume: 63
Issue: 3
Pages: 905-917
ISSN: 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
1520-8524
DOI: 10.1121/1.381770
OpenAlex: W2026219038
Cited by: 430
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI: 9.72
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: National Institutes of Health
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords: speech perception, chinchilla, Chinchilla lanigera, voice onset time, identification function, phonetic boundaries, cross-species comparison, infant speech perception
MeSH terms: Acoustics, Adult, Animals, Auditory Perception, Chinchilla, Biological Evolution, Humans, Infant, Phonetics, Species Specificity, Speech, Time Factors, Voice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks