Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure

Kim, D. O., Molnar, C. E., Matthews, J. W.·1980·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Over the last five years, we have studied spatial distributions of cochlear responses to single- and two-tone stimuli by recording sequentially from as many as 418 cochlear nerve fibers in each cat and obtaining plots of amplitude and phase of response components at primary and distortion frequencies. We have observed: (1) that such responses to two-tone stimuli of sound pressure levels (SPL) as low as 34 dB re 20 μN/m2 rms show noticeable deviations from linear behavior; (2) that two major forms of nonlinear behavior in responses to two-tone stimuli are distortion products and two-tone suppression; (3) that the spatial distributions of amplitude and phase of (2f1-f2) and (f2-f1) components in response to two-tone stimuli are similar, in the region near and apical to the distortion-frequency place, to those of the fs component in response to a single-tone stimulus whose frequency fs is equal to the particular distortion frequency, and dissimilar in the more basal region; and (4) that each of the f1 and f2 components in the response is mutually suppressed in regions where the other response component is large. By examining acoustic signals near the eardrum of the cat and the chinchilla with a closed acoustic system containing a probe microphone, we have observed, with SPL of the primary frequencies ranging from 40 to 95 dB, that the levels of the acoustic distortion signals (2f1-f2) and (f2-f1) can be as large as −30 and −43 dB, respectively, relative to the primary levels. Our results from a model for the peripheral auditory system consisting of a two-dimensional model for cochlear mechanics (with nonlinear equivalent basilar-membrane damping) coupled to a linear model for middle ear and acoustic coupler show qualitative agreement with our animal data. These animal and model studies support the following interpretations: (1) mechanical distortion signals (2f1-f2) and (f2-f1) are generated in the cochlear region where the f1 and f2 components are both large; (2) these distortion signals propagate both apically toward the distortion-frequency place and basally toward the stapes, through the middle ear and into the ear canal; and (3) mutual suppression of the f1 and f2 components and generation of the propagating distortion products are likely to be present concurrently in cochlear-partition motion. We have also found that both neurally observed and acoustically observed distortion products are reversibly reduced by exposing the ear for 1 or 2 min to a fatiguing single tone at SPL of 80 to 90 dB at a frequency near or slightly below the primary frequencies. Observations of the effects of the single-tone fatiguing and of anoxia on acoustic distortion signals demonstrate physiological vulnerability of mechanically present nonlinear behavior of the ear. Our results support the hypothesis that, in the mechanoelectrophysiological transduction occurring in the normal organ of Corti, response variables of the mechanical domain (e.g., basilar-membrane motion) and of the electrophysiological domain (e.g., hair-cell mambrane potential) are bidirectionally coupled such that nonlinear behavior originating from either domain produces effects that can also be observed in the other domain. One of the functionally useful effects of cochlear nonlinearity appears to be an increase in the dynamic range by compression of the amplitude of cochlear-partition motion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.384297

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Kim, D. O., Molnar, C. E., & Matthews, J. W.
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1980-05-01
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
1704-1721
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2084156154
Cited by
306
References
0
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.384297
The paper
Kim, D. O., Molnar, C. E., & Matthews, J. W. (1980). Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.384297

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.