The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discrimination of speech by nonhuman animals: Basic auditory sensitivities conducive to the perception of speech-sound categories
Abstract
Chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger) were tested in a same–different task to determine the location of greatest sensitivity along a continuum of voice-onset-time (VOT). The procedure used was an up–down staircase technique which allowed the determination of the just-noticeable-difference in VOT (Δ VOT) for VOT’s on a continuum ranging from [dα] to [tα]. Results demonstrated that the animals were most sensitive to change (i.e., produced the smallest Δ VOT values) in the region of the phonetic boundary dividing voiceless-unaspirated and voiceless-aspirated sounds, in good agreement with the boundary value previously obtained in an identification task with this same species [Kuhl and Miller, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 905 (1978)]. The results support the notion that the mammalian auditory system provided a selective pressure on the choice of acoustic cues to represent the phonetic oppositions employed by the world’s languages. The data are discussed in terms of the original definition of categorical perception and current psychoacoustic explanations of the peak in sensitivity for two-component stimuli varying in onset time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In tests of discrimination, monkeys showed peaks in sensitivity that coincided with the phonetic boundaries used by languages (20–22) (Fig. 4).”
From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“This difference is of interest in light of previous research demonstrating many commonalities between young infants and animals in tests of speech perception, particularly those involving categorical perception (Kuhl, 1981;Kuhl & Miller, 1975, 1978;Kuhl & Padden, 1982, 1983;Morse & Snowdon, 1975;Waters & Wilson, 1976).”
From Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not (1991) · cites this paper as Kuhl, 1981
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–188 of 188
Auditory and Phonetic Coding of Speech
Sawusch, J. R. (1986) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-631403-8.50007-2 · Cited by 17
An ideological battle over modals and quantifiers
Piattelli‐Palmarini, M. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081280 · Cited by 16
Schneider, A. (2018) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55004-5_31 · Cited by 16
New Prospects for Speech by the Hearing Impaired
Fletcher, S. G. (1983) · Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608609-6.50007-4 · Cited by 16
Gervain, J. (2020) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-64150-2.00016-2 · Cited by 21
Can a gray seal (Halichoerus grypus) generalize call classes?
Stansbury, A. L., de Freitas, M., Wu, G., & Janik, V. M. (2015) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0039756 · Cited by 15
How Theories of Speech Affect Research in Reading and Writing
Blachman, B. A. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781410601230-9 · Cited by 15
Sober, E. R. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081371 · Cited by 14
Voicing judgements by chinchillas trained with a reward paradigm
Ohlemiller, K. K., Jones, L. B., Heidbreder, A. F., Clark, W. W., & Miller, J. D. (1999) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00130-2 · Cited by 15
Sinnott, J. M., Brown, C. H., & Borneman, M. A. (1998) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211937 · Cited by 14
Hay, J. F., Holt, L. L., Lotto, A. J., & Diehl, R. L. (2005) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4786613 · Cited by 13
The Influence of Tonal and Atonal Bilingualism on Children’s Lexical and Non-Lexical Tone Perception
Morett, L. M. (2019) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830919834679 · Cited by 13
“Theoretically, this possibility is consistent with models of speech perception that hold that speech and non-speech sounds are processed and represented similarly using shared mechanisms (Kluender, Diehl, & Killeen, 1987; Kuhl, 1981).”
ResultNatural selection or shareability?
Freyd, J. J. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081115 · Cited by 13
Perception and production of English /r/-/l/ by adult Japanese speakers
Hattori, K. (2010) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 13
Steadman, M., & Sumner, C. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00671 · Cited by 11
“This research, coupled with animal psychoacoustic experiments on speech discrimination in non-human mammals (Burdick and Miller, 1975; Kuhl, 1981; Hienz and Brady, 1988; Hienz et al., 1996; Engineer et al., 2008; Bizley et al., 2013), hints that at least some aspects of human speech perception are rooted in generalize…”
BackgroundThe Role of Psychophysics in Understanding Speech Perception
Repp, B. H. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_1 · Cited by 12
The emergence of homo loquens and the laws of physics
Otero, C. P. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081267 · Cited by 11
Acoustic patterns common to human communication and communication between monkeys
Maurus, M., Barclay, D., & Streit, K.-M. (1988) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/0271-5309(88)90008-0 · Cited by 11
Representation of initial stop consonants in a computational model of the dorsal cochlear nucleus
Damper, R. I., Pont, M. J., & Elenius, K. O. E. (1990) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 11
A Rube Goldberg machine par excellence
Gopnik, M. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081127 · Cited by 11
Beyond the roadblock in linguistic evolution studies
Hurford, J. R. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081140 · Cited by 9
Toward an adaptationist psycholinguistics
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081346 · Cited by 10
Wilkins, W. K., & Dumford, J. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0008136x · Cited by 10
Best, C. T. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118829516.ch21 · Cited by 10
Natural selection and the autonomy of syntax
Newmeyer, F. J. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081243 · Cited by 9
Arbitrariness no argument against adaption
Ridley, M. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081309 · Cited by 9
Adaptive complexity in sound patterns
Lindblom, B. E. F. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081218 · Cited by 9
Chen, G., & Sinex, D. G. (1999) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00146-x · Cited by 9
Discovering Messages in the Medium
Best, C. T. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1660-0_4 · Cited by 10
Speech perception and the learnability of languages
Wode, H. (1994) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.1994.tb00061.x · Cited by 8
What would a theory of language evolution have to look like?
Jackendoff, R. S. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081152 · Cited by 9
Effects of preceding context on discrimination of voice onset times
Repp, B. H., & Lin, H.-B. (1989) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03204947 · Cited by 8
On the coevolution of language and social competence
Premack, D. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081292 · Cited by 7
Hienz, R. D., & Brady, J. V. (1989) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00442820 · Cited by 8
“1981), chinchillas (Burdick and Miller 1975; Kuhl 1981), cats (Dewson 1964), and monkeys (Dewson et al.”
BackgroundSclan, J. (2012) · International Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.46867/c46k6h · Cited by 6
The genome might as well store the entire language in the environment
Ninio, A. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081255 · Cited by 6
Development of Speech Perception
Gervain, J. (2022) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81542-4_8 · Cited by 6
Simulation of Neural Responses that Underlie Speech Discrimination
Sinex, D. G. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3560-7_22 · Cited by 6
Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners
Shofner, W. P. (2014) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4867362 · Cited by 5
Linguistic function and linguistic evolution
Broadwell, G. A. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081085 · Cited by 5
Behavioral vs. cognitive views of speech perception and production.
Schlinger, H. D. (2010) · The Journal of Speech and Language Pathology – Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1037/h0100271 · Cited by 5
Native and Non-Native Speech Perception
Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2014) · Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) · Cited by 5
Multiple-Phoneme-Misarticulating Children's Perception and Production of Voice Onset Time
Hoffman, P. R., Daniloff, R. G., Alfonso, P. J., et al. (1984) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1984.58.2.603 · Cited by 5
Some consequences of the representation of words in memory
Halle, M. (1997) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/s0024-3841(96)00043-5 · Cited by 5
Lexical tone perception and production : the role of language and musical background
Schwanhäuβer, B. (2007) · Cited by 5
Cortical representations for phonological quantity
Ylinen, S. (2006) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 5
Acoustic signals as visual biofeedback in the speech training of hearing impaired children
Crawford, E. (2007) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/8186 · Cited by 5
Structured Variation in Obstruent Production and Perception
Chodroff, E. (2017) · Cited by 5
Perception of synthetic speech sounds by the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)
Dooling, R. J., Soli, S. D., Kline, R. M., Park, T. J., Hue, C., & Bunnell, H. T. (1987) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03330308 · Cited by 4
Emergence of Linguistic Communication: Studies on Grey Parrots
Pepperberg, I. M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-779-4_19 · Cited by 4
Towards a continuous population model for natural language vowel shift
Shipman, P. D., Faria, S. H., & Strickland, C. (2013) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.04.017 · Cited by 4
“Formant frequencies for a vowel vary with dimensions of the vocal tract (Fant, 1973; Peterson and Barney, 1952) (see Kuhl, 1983 for a discussion).”
BackgroundBouchon, C., & Toro, J. M. (2019) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01280-3 · Cited by 5
“…consonant changes in our stimuli involved plosive consonants (14 out of 16 changes), which are at the bottom of the sonority scale on which vowels are at the top, and constitute the most distinct consonant contrasts acoustically (Ladefoged 1993, 2001) including in rodents (Kuhl 1981; Dooling et al.”
BackgroundMethodMachine-assisted phonemic analysis
Kempton, T. (2012) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 4
Hornstein, N. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081139 · Cited by 7
Sinnott, J. M., Powell, L. A., & Camchong, J. (2006) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2162440 · Cited by 3
Grammar yes, generative grammar no
Tomasello, M. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081334 · Cited by 4
Flaherty, M. M., Dent, M. L., & Sawusch, J. R. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177676 · Cited by 3
Välimaa, T. (2002) · Cited by 3
López-Bascuas, L. E. (1994) · Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología · doi:10.1174/02109399460578971 · Cited by 3
“Kuhl (1981) realizó el experimento y comprobó, en un continuo /da/-/ta/, que la discriminación era máxima en torno a 33 ms, precisamente el punto de TIS correspondiente a la frontera entre categorías para ese continuo.”
BackgroundIssues in the evolution of the human language faculty
Pinker, S. A., & Bloom, P. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081383 · Cited by 3
Lessons from the study of speech perception
Kluender, K. R. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081176 · Cited by 3
The Role of Prenatal Experience and Basic Auditory Mechanisms in the Development of Language
Ortiz-Barajas, M. C., & Gervain, J. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119684527.ch4 · Cited by 3
Contrasting Accounts of Early Speech Perception and Production
Schlinger, H. D. (2023) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-023-00371-4 · Cited by 2
“As Kuhl (1981) stated, “the evolution of the sound system of language was influenced by the general auditory abilities of mammals” (p. 347).”
The development and execution of mate choice in túngara frogs
Baugh, A. T. (2009) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Language evolved – So what's new?
Limber, J. E. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081206 · Cited by 2
“1986), and the second by the fact that nonhuman listeners form the same categories that human listeners do (Diehl & Kluender 1989; Kluender et al. 1987; Kuhl 1981; Kuhl & Miller 1978; Kuhl & Padden 1983).”
BackgroundFrom Parsing Actions to Understanding Intentions
Byrne, R. W. (2011) · Biosemiotics/Biosemiotics. Bookseries · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2336-8_8 · Cited by 2
Five exaptations in speech: Reducing the arbitrariness of the constraints on language
Kingston, J. K. C. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081164 · Cited by 2
Infants’ Perception of Speech: Constraints on Characterizations of the Initial State
Kuhl, P. K. (1986) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-08023-6_16 · Cited by 2
Self-citationImitation of F0 tone contours by Mandarin and English speakers is both categorical and continuous
Zhang, W., Clayards, M. A., & Sonderegger, M. (2025) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2025.101457 · Cited by 3
Why chimps matter to language origin
Ulbæk, I. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081358 · Cited by 1
Seeing language evolution in the eye: Adaptive complexity or visual illusion?
Frazier, L. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081103 · Cited by 1
Middle position on language, cognition, and evolution
Maratsos, M. P. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081231 · Cited by 1
Children's Sensitivity to Pitch Variation in Language
Quam, C. (2010)
Ontogenetic Changes in Children's Speech–Sound Perception
Bernstein, L. E. (1982) · Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608608-9.50012-7
Toro, J. M., & Trobalón, J. B. (2005)
Physiologie Acoustic Basis of Speech Perception
Angelo, R. M. (1985) · Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0030-6665(20)31868-5
The Acquisition of Phonetic Categories: An Artificial Language Learning Study
Moeng, E. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/5qre-dd74
Language in the genes: Where’s the evidence?
Bohn, O. (2019) · Aahus University Library eBooks · doi:10.7146/aul.348.90
Irvine, D. R. F. (1986) · Progress in sensory physiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-71057-5_9
Magnus, D. C. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0008122x
Subcortical Processing of Speech Sounds
Chandrasekaran, B., Tessmer, R., & Gnanateja, G. N. (2022) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81542-4_2
(2000) · Odile Jacob eBooks · doi:10.3917/oj.segui.2000.01.0299
Is core knowledge a natural subdivision of infant cognition?
Kaicher, C. M., Conti, J., Dedhe, A. M., Aulet, L. S., & Cantlon, J. F. (2024) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x23003229
L'étude comparative de la perception de la parole : nouveaux développements 1
Ramus, F. (2006) · Rééducation orthophonique
ABX-discriminability measures and applications
Schatz, T. (2016) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/154e51eczd391z476azbc0fz763e7f763682 · Cited by 30
Étude de la symétrie et de la sémantique combinatoire chez le babouin de Guinée (Papio papio)
Médam, T. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/63a6d07dz843fz4033z945fz6449df44fe1a
Statistical cues affect phonetic discrimination in Dutch infants
Capel, D. J. H. (2008) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
The Evolution of Learning to Communicate: Avian Model for the Missing Link
Pepperberg, I. M. (2011) · Biosemiotics/Biosemiotics. Bookseries · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2336-8_7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhl, P. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuhl, Patricia K.
- ORCID
- Kuhl, Patricia K.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1981-08-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 340-349
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2031282998
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Keywords
- speech perception, chinchilla, voice onset time, just noticeable difference, phonetic boundaries, auditory sensitivity, categorical perception, acoustic cues, mammalian auditory system, psychoacoustics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
