Cited by 231Phonetics and Phonology ResearchAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeuroscience and Music Perception

Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques

Kuhl, Patricia K., Padden, Denise M.·1983·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Discrimination of speech-sound pairs drawn from a computer-generated continuum in which syllables varied along the place of articulation phonetic feature (/b, d, g/) was tested with macaques. The acoustic feature that was varied along the two-formant 15-step continuum was the starting frequency of the second-formant transition. Discrimination of stimulus pairs separated by two steps was tested along the entire continuum in a same–different task. Results demonstrated that peaks in the discrimination functions occur for macaques at the ‘‘phonetic boundaries’’ which separate the /b–d/ and /d–g/ categories for human listeners. The data support two conclusions. First, although current theoretical accounts of place perception by human adults suggest that isolated second-formant transitions are ‘‘secondary’’ cues, learned by association with primary cues, the animal data are more capatible with the notion that second-formant transitions are sufficient to allow the appropriate partitioning of a place continuum in the absence of associative pairing with other more complex cues. Second, we discuss two potential roles played by audition in the evolution of the acoustics of language. One is that audition provided a set of ‘‘natural psychophysical boundaries,’’ based on rather simple acoustic properties, which guided the selection of the phonetic repertoire but did not solely determine it; the other is that audition provided a set of rules for the formation of ‘‘natural classes’’ of sound and that phonetic units met those criteria. The data provided in this experiment provide support for the former. Experiments that could more clearly differentiate the two hypotheses are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.389148

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monkeys show peaks in sensitivity that coincide with the phonetic boundaries used by languages.

    “In tests of discrimination, monkeys showed peaks in sensitivity that coincided with the phonetic boundaries used by languages (20–22) (Fig. 4).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [22]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 231

Authors
Kuhl, P. K., & Padden, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1983-03-01
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
1003-1010
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2002681612
Cited by
231
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
place of articulation, phonetic boundaries, speech sound discrimination, macaque, auditory perception, phonetic classification, language evolution, acoustic cues
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Communication Aids for Disabled, Female, Humans, Macaca, Male, Phonetics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review