The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the oscillations of musical instruments
Abstract
The time-domain description of musical and other nonlinear oscillators complements the more commonly used frequency-domain description, and is advantageous for some purposes. It is especially advantageous when studying large-amplitude oscillations, for which nonlinearity may be severe. It gives direct insight into the physical reasons for the variation of waveform as playing conditions vary, and into certain phenomena which may seem counter-intuitive from the frequency-domain viewpoint, such as the musically undesirable flattening in the pitch of a bowed string when the bow is pressed too hard onto the string. It is easy to set up efficient time-domain simulations on a small computer, a fact that has been surprisingly little exploited in musical acoustics. The simplest relevant model is described here. It demonstrates some of the basic nonlinear behavior of the clarinet, violin, and flute families with very little programming effort. Remarkably, a single set of model equations has relevance to all three cases, at a certain level of idealization, with appropriate choices of parameter values and of linear and nonlinear characteristics. For the flute family, this simplest model gives waveforms and phase relations closely resembling those observed at resonance in the organ-pipe experiments of Coltman [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, 725–733 (1976)], including the triangular pressure and velocity waveforms. It can be shown (again using a time-domain approach) that the triangular waveform is a universal limiting form, independent of detailed acoustic loss mechanisms provided losses are small.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physical Modeling Using Digital Waveguides
Smith, J. O. (1992) · Computer Music Journal · doi:10.2307/3680470 · Cited by 469
How Do We Hear in the World? Explorations in Ecological Acoustics
Gaver, W. W. (1993) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0504_2 · Cited by 398
(2012) · Home Studio Setup · doi:10.4324/9780080928456-6 · Cited by 316
Applications of Digital Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics
(2002) · The International Series in Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.1007/b117882 · Cited by 278
Discrete-time modelling of musical instruments
Välimäki, V., Pakarinen, J., Erkut, C., & Karjalainen, M. (2006) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/1/r01 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- McIntyre, M. E., Schumacher, R. T., & Woodhouse, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1983-11-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1325-1345
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2014517420
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the oscillations of musical instruments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.390157
- The paper
- McIntyre, M. E., Schumacher, R. T., & Woodhouse, J. (1983). On the oscillations of musical instruments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.390157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.