The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of text-to-speech conversion for English
Abstract
The automatic conversion of English text to synthetic speech is presently being performed, remarkably well, by a number of laboratory systems and commercial devices. Progress in this area has been made possible by advances in linguistic theory, acoustic–phonetic characterization of English sound patterns, perceptual psychology, mathematical modeling of speech production, structured programming, and computer hardware design. This review traces the early work on the development of speech synthesizers, discovery of minimal acoustic cues for phonetic contrasts, evolution of phonemic rule programs, incorporation of prosodic rules, and formulation of techniques for text analysis. Examples of rules are used liberally to illustrate the state of the art. Many of the examples are taken from Klattalk, a text-to-speech system developed by the author. A number of scientific problems are identified that prevent current systems from achieving the goal of completely human-sounding speech. While the emphasis is on rule programs that drive a formant synthesizer, alternatives such as articulatory synthesis and waveform concatenation are also reviewed. An extensive bibliography has been assembled to show both the breadth of synthesis activity and the wealth of phenomena covered by rules in the best of these programs. A recording of selected examples of the historical development of synthetic speech, enclosed as a 33 (1)/(3) - rpm record, is described in the Appendix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of verbal and non-verbal human–robot interactive communication
Mavridis, N. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.031 · Cited by 453
A survey on neural speech synthesis
Tan, X., Qin, T., Soong, F., & Liu, T.-Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.15561 · Cited by 216
Discrete-time modelling of musical instruments
Välimäki, V., Pakarinen, J., Erkut, C., & Karjalainen, M. (2006) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/1/r01 · Cited by 153
Interacting with computers by voice: automatic speech recognition and synthesis
O'Shaughnessy, D. (2003) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2003.817117 · Cited by 132
Open Problems in Cooperative AI
Dafoe, A., Hughes, E., Bachrach, Y., Collins, T., McKee, K. R., Leibo, J. Z., Larson, K., & Graepel, T. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08630 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Klatt, D. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1987-09-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 737-793
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2066452495
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of text-to-speech conversion for English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.395275
- The paper
- Klatt, D. H. (1987). Review of text-to-speech conversion for English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.