Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection

Houtgast, T.·1989·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

For a broadband noise carrier, the modulation detection threshold for sinusoidal amplitude modulation (the test modulation) is measured in the presence of an additional modulation (the masker modulation). Two traditional approaches for revealing effects of frequency selectivity in the audiofrequency domain are shown to give comparable results in the modulation-frequency domain: (1) a typically peaked modulation-detection threshold pattern when the masker modulation is a fixed narrow band of noise, and (2) an effect of leveling off of the increase of the modulation-detection threshold when, for a fixed test-modulation frequency, the masker-modulation bandwidth is widened beyond a certain ‘‘critical’’ bandwidth. It is argued that the present results on frequency selectivity in modulation detection underline the perceptual relevance of a spectral decomposition of a signal’s temporal envelope and provide a rationale for the application of modern concepts like the speech-envelope spectrum or the modulation-transfer function in relation to speech intelligibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.397956

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Houtgast, T.
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1989-04-01
Volume
85
Issue
4
Pages
1676-1680
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2046343773
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.397956
The paper
Houtgast, T. (1989). Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397956

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.