The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parametric generalized Gaussian density estimation
Abstract
The primary objective of this paper is to compare the large-sample as well as the small-sample properties of different methods for estimating the parameters of a three-parameter generalized Gaussian distribution. Three estimators, namely, the moment method (MM), the maximum-likelihood (ML), and the moment/Newton-step (MNS) estimators, are considered. The applicability of general asymptotic optimality results of the efficient ML and MNS estimation techniques is studied in the generalized Gaussian context. The asymptotic normal distributions of the estimators are obtained. The asymptotic relative superiority of the ML estimator or its variant, the MNS estimator, over the moment method is studied in terms of asymptotic relative efficiency. Based on this study, it is concluded that deviations from normality in the underlying distribution of the data necessitate the use of the efficient ML or MNS methods. In the small-sample case, a detailed comparative study of the estimators is made possible by extensive Monte Carlo simulations. From this study, it is concluded that the maximum-likelihood method is found to be significantly superior for heavy-tailed distributions. In a region of the parameter space corresponding to the vicinity of the Gaussian distribution, the moment method compares well with the other methods. Further, the MNS estimator is shown to perform best for light-tailed distributions. The simulation results are shown to lend support to analytically derived asymptotic results for each of the methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Image super-resolution using gradient profile prior
Sun, J., Xu, Z., & Shum, H.-Y. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587659 · Cited by 916
Sharifi, K., & Leon-Garcia, A. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/76.350779 · Cited by 540
Metadata
- Authors
- Varanasi, M. K., & Aazhang, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1989-10-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1404-1415
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2052199757
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parametric generalized Gaussian density estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.398700
- The paper
- Varanasi, M. K., & Aazhang, B. (1989). Parametric generalized Gaussian density estimation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.