The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vocal intensity in speakers and singers
Abstract
Vocal intensity is studied as a function of fundamental frequency and lung pressure. A combination of analytical and empirical models is used to predict sound pressure levels from glottal waveforms of five professional tenors and twenty five normal control subjects. The glottal waveforms were obtained by inverse filtering the mouth flow. Empirical models describe features of the glottal flow waveform (peak flow, peak flow derivative, open quotient, and speed quotient) in terms of lung pressure and phonation threshold pressure, a key variable that incorporates the F0 dependence of many of the features of the glottal flow. The analytical model describes the contributions to sound pressure levels SPL by the vocal tract. Results show that SPL increases with F0 at a rate of 8–9 dB/octave provided that lung pressure is raised proportional to phonation threshold pressure. The SPL also increases at a rate of 8–9 dB per doubling of excess pressure over threshold, a new quantity that assumes considerable importance in vocal intensity calculations. For the same excess pressure over threshold, the professional tenors produced 10–12 dB greater intensity than the male nonsingers, primarily because their peak airflow was much higher for the same pressures. A simple set of rules is devised for predicting SPL from source waveforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tensor Fusion Network for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
Zadeh, A., Chen, M., Poria, S., Cambria, E., & Morency, L.-P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1115 · Cited by 2,102
Aerosol Emission and Superemission during Human Speech Increase with Voice Loudness
Asadi, S., Wexler, A. S., Cappa, C. D., Barreda, S., Bouvier, N. M., & Ristenpart, W. D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38808-z · Cited by 919
COVAREP — A collaborative voice analysis repository for speech technologies
Degottex, G., Kane, J., Drugman, T., Raitio, T., & Scherer, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2014.6853739 · Cited by 695
Nonlinear source–filter coupling in phonation: Theory
Titze, I. R. (2008) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2832337 · Cited by 425
Self-citationComparison of Two Forms of Intensive Speech Treatment for Parkinson Disease
Ramig, L. O., Countryman, S., Thompson, L. L., & Horii, Y. (1995) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3806.1232 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Titze, I. R., & Sundberg, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1992-05-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2936-2946
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2017857509
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vocal intensity in speakers and singers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.402929
- The paper
- Titze, I. R., & Sundberg, J. (1992). Vocal intensity in speakers and singers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.