Cited by 130Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionVoice and Speech Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

F 0 gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times

Whalen, D. H., Abramson, Arthur S., Lisker, Leigh, Mody, Maria·1993·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

The voiced/voiceless distinction for English utterance-initial stop consonants is primarily realized as differences in the voice onset time (VOT), which is largely signaled by the time between the stop burst and the onset of voicing. The voicing of stops has also been shown to affect the vowel’s F0 after release, with voiceless stops being associated with higher F0. When the VOT is ambiguous, these F0 ‘‘perturbations’’ have been shown to affect voicing judgments. This is to be expected of what can be considered a redundant feature, that is, that it should carry a distinction in cases where the primary feature is neutralized. However, when the voicing judgments were made as quickly as possible, an inappropriate F0 was found to slow response time even for unambiguous VOTs. This was true both of F0 contours and level F0 differences. These results reinforce the plausibility of tonogenesis, and they add further weight to the claim that listeners make full use of the signal given to them, even when overt labeling would seem to indicate otherwise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.406678

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Whalen, D. H., Abramson, A. S., Lisker, L., & Mody, M.
Affiliations
Haskins Laboratories (US)
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1993-04-01
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
2152-2159
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2037202621
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-01994, P01HD001994)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
fundamental frequency, voicing, voice onset time, stop consonants, feature redundancy, tonogenesis, reaction time (psychology), vowel fundamental frequency
MeSH terms
Audiometry, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Male, Phonetics, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review