The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast
Abstract
Four experiments, all of which focused on vowel duration, assessed Chinese subjects’ production and perception of the contrast between /t/ and /d/ in the final position of English words. Vowel duration was measured in minimal pairs in the first experiment. The stimuli in natural-edited beat–bead and bat–bad continua in which vowel duration varied in 20-ms steps were then presented to native English and Chinese subjects in a forced-choice test, in an experiment using the method of adjustment, and in an imitation task. The non-natives who learned English in childhood closely resembled native speakers in all four experiments. Three groups of non-natives who had learned English as a second language in adulthood, on the other hand, differed from the native speakers. The late learners produced significantly longer vowels in words ending in /d/ than /t/. However, the late learners’ vowel duration differences were much smaller than the native speakers’, and were correlated significantly with degree of foreign accent in English. The late learners differed from the native speakers in several ways in the two perception experiments, and also in the imitation task. The pattern of significant and nonsignificant between-group differences, but not data for individual subjects, was consistent with the hypothesis that L2 (second language) production accuracy is limited by the adequacy of perceptual representations for sounds in the L2.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Speakers who learn a second language after puberty produce it with an “accent” typical of their primary language, even after long-term instruction (90).”
From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [90]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A new view of language acquisition
Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 · Cited by 773
Guenther, F. H. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.594 · Cited by 496
“For example, although grouped data in the experiments of Flege (1993) were in accordance with the hypothesis that proper perception precedes proper production in second language learners, the data for individual participants did not support this hypothesis: As many participants showed large production effects of the s…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialTHE EFFECT OF EXPERIENCE ON ADULTS' ACQUISITION OF A SECOND LANGUAGE
Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2001) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263101004041 · Cited by 403
Self-citationAcoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1531176 · Cited by 368
A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián‐Gallés, N. (1997) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00030-9 · Cited by 345
“The most recent data are consistent with the hypothesis that non-natives resemble native speakers more closely in perceiving than in producing some sounds (Flege, 1993).”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Flege, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Flege, James Emil
- ORCID
- Flege, James Emil
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1589-1608
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2051401856
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC00257, R01DC000257)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- vowel duration, English as a second language, Chinese learners of English, late learners, foreign accent, speech perception, speech production, phonetic imitation, perceptual representation, minimal pairs
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Phonetics, Speech Perception, Speech Production Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review